Suppr超能文献

五因素和七因素人格模型:TCI-R、NEO-FFI-R 和 ZKPQ-50-CC 之间的差异和相似性。

The five and seven factors personality models: differences and similitude between the TCI-R, NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC.

机构信息

Institut de Recerca Biomèdica (IRBLleida), Area de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico, Universitat de Lleida, Avda de l'Estudi General, 4. 25001 Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2011 Nov;14(2):659-66. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.14.

Abstract

The present study tests the relationships between the three frequently used personality models evaluated by the Temperament Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R), Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five Factor Inventory - Revised (NEO-FFI-R) and Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire-50- Cross-Cultural (ZKPQ-50-CC). The results were obtained with a sample of 928 volunteer subjects from the general population aged between 17 and 28 years old. Frequency distributions and alpha reliabilities with the three instruments were acceptable. Correlational and factorial analyses showed that several scales in the three instruments share an appreciable amount of common variance. Five factors emerged from principal components analysis. The first factor was integrated by A (Agreeableness), Co (Cooperativeness) and Agg-Host (Aggressiveness-Hostility), with secondary loadings in C (Conscientiousness) and SD (Self-directiveness) from other factors. The second factor was composed by N (Neuroticism), N-Anx (Neuroticism-Anxiety), HA (Harm Avoidance) and SD (Self-directiveness). The third factor was integrated by Sy (Sociability), E (Extraversion), RD (Reward Dependence), ImpSS (Impulsive Sensation Seeking) and NS (novelty Seeking). The fourth factor was integrated by Ps (Persistence), Act (Activity), and C, whereas the fifth and last factor was composed by O (Openness) and ST (Self- Transcendence). Confirmatory factor analyses indicate that the scales in each model are highly interrelated and define the specified latent dimension well. Similarities and differences between these three instruments are further discussed.

摘要

本研究检验了特质人格问卷修订版(TCI-R)、五因素人格问卷修订版(NEO-FFI-R)和 Zuckerman-Kuhlman 人格问卷-50-跨文化版(ZKPQ-50-CC)三种常用人格模型之间的关系。该研究的样本为来自普通人群的 928 名 17 至 28 岁的志愿者。三种工具的频率分布和 alpha 信度均为可接受。相关和因子分析表明,三种工具的几个量表具有相当大的共同方差。主成分分析得出了五个因素。第一个因素由 A(宜人性)、Co(合作性)和 Agg-Host(攻击性-敌意)组成,C(尽责性)和 SD(自我导向性)从其他因素获得次要负荷。第二个因素由 N(神经质)、N-Anx(神经质-焦虑)、HA(回避性)和 SD(自我导向性)组成。第三个因素由 Sy(社交性)、E(外向性)、RD(奖赏依赖)、ImpSS(冲动感觉寻求)和 NS(新奇寻求)组成。第四个因素由 Ps(坚持性)、Act(活动性)和 C 组成,第五个也是最后一个因素由 O(开放性)和 ST(自我超越)组成。验证性因子分析表明,每种模型中的量表高度相关,能很好地定义指定的潜在维度。进一步讨论了这三种工具之间的相似点和差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验