Suppr超能文献

戒烟试验的结果标准:通用标准提案。

Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard.

作者信息

West Robert, Hajek Peter, Stead Lindsay, Stapleton John

机构信息

University College, London, UK.

出版信息

Addiction. 2005 Mar;100(3):299-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00995.x.

Abstract

Smoking cessation treatment is now integrated into many health-care systems and a major research effort is under way to improve current success rates. Until now results from randomized clinical trials have been reported in many different ways, leading to problems of interpretation. We propose six standard criteria comprising the 'Russell Standard' (RS). These criteria are applicable to trials of cessation aids where participants have a defined target quit date and there is face-to-face contact with researchers or clinic staff, as follows. (1) Follow-up for 6 months (RS6) or 12 months (RS12) from the target quit date or the end of a predefined 'grace period'; (2) self-report of smoking abstinence over the whole follow-up period allowing up to five cigarettes in total; (3) biochemical verification of abstinence at least at the 6-month or 12-month follow-up point; (4) use of an 'intention-to-treat' approach in which data from all randomized smokers are included in the analysis unless they have died or moved to an untraceable address (participants who are included in the analysis are counted as smokers if their smoking status at the final follow-up cannot be determined); (5) following-up 'protocol violators' and using their true smoking status in the analysis; and (6) collecting follow-up data blind to smokers' allocation to trial group. We believe that these criteria provide the best compromise between practicability and surrogacy for long-term cessation and will enable meaningful comparison between studies. There may be good reasons why other outcome criteria would also be reported, and studies that involve interventions with special groups or where there is no designated target quit date or face to face contact would need to adapt these criteria accordingly.

摘要

戒烟治疗目前已被纳入许多医疗保健系统,并且正在进行一项重大研究工作以提高当前的成功率。到目前为止,随机临床试验的结果有多种不同的报告方式,这导致了解释方面的问题。我们提出了六项标准准则,包括“拉塞尔标准”(RS)。这些准则适用于戒烟辅助手段的试验,其中参与者有明确的目标戒烟日期,并且与研究人员或诊所工作人员有面对面接触,具体如下。(1)从目标戒烟日期或预定义“宽限期”结束起随访6个月(RS6)或12个月(RS12);(2)在整个随访期间自我报告戒烟情况,总共允许最多抽五支烟;(3)至少在6个月或12个月随访点进行戒烟的生化验证;(4)采用“意向性分析”方法,即所有随机分组的吸烟者的数据都纳入分析,除非他们已经死亡或搬到无法追踪的地址(如果最终随访时其吸烟状态无法确定,纳入分析的参与者计为吸烟者);(5)对“违反方案者”进行随访,并在分析中使用他们的真实吸烟状态;(6)在对吸烟者分配到试验组不知情的情况下收集随访数据。我们认为这些准则在长期戒烟的实用性和替代指标之间提供了最佳折衷方案,并将使各项研究之间能够进行有意义的比较。可能有充分理由报告其他结局标准,并且涉及特殊群体干预或没有指定目标戒烟日期或无面对面接触的研究需要相应调整这些准则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验