Wagena E J, Knipschild P, Zeegers M P A
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Addiction. 2005 Mar;100(3):317-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00998.x.
The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of nortriptyline for smoking cessation compared to placebo and bupropion sustained release.
Randomized trials were identified by (1) checking electronic and (2) online publicly accessible registers of clinical trials; (3) searching references of identified studies and screening abstract books of conferences and symposia, and (4) personal communication with the first authors of identified papers.
We included randomized trials in which nortriptyline was compared to placebo or bupropion hydrochloride SR. The main clinical outcome measure was (at least) 6-month prolonged abstinence, confirmed with a biochemical test. To investigate the efficacy of nortriptyline in time, we calculated the percentage of smokers who relapsed in time.
We identified five randomized trials, including 861 smokers. Compared to placebo medication, nortriptyline resulted in significantly higher prolonged abstinence rates after at least 6 months [relative risk (RR) = 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.6; RD = 0.11, 95% CI 0.07-0.15]. The difference in efficacy between nortriptyline and placebo was highest in the first months after the target quit date. However, the number of people who remained abstinent decreased substantially and significantly faster over time in the nortriptyline group. Although bupropion resulted in higher abstinence rates compared with nortriptyline, the difference was not statistically significant (RR = 1.7, 95% CI 0.7-4.1).
This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that the use of nortriptyline for smoking cessation resulted in higher prolonged abstinence rates after at least 6 months compared to placebo treatment. Furthermore, the use of nortriptyline for smoking cessation is well tolerated and safe. As a result, we believe health care professionals should be recommended to prescribe nortriptyline as a first-line therapy for smoking cessation, also because of the much lower cost of nortriptyline compared to bupropion SR.
本文旨在评估去甲替林与安慰剂及安非他酮缓释剂相比在戒烟方面的疗效。
通过以下方式识别随机试验:(1)检查电子数据库;(2)在线公开的临床试验注册库;(3)检索已识别研究的参考文献并筛选会议和研讨会的摘要书籍;(4)与已识别论文的第一作者进行个人交流。
我们纳入了将去甲替林与安慰剂或盐酸安非他酮缓释剂进行比较的随机试验。主要临床结局指标是(至少)6个月的持续戒烟,通过生化检测确认。为了及时研究去甲替林的疗效,我们计算了及时复吸的吸烟者百分比。
我们识别出五项随机试验,包括861名吸烟者。与安慰剂治疗相比,去甲替林在至少6个月后导致显著更高的持续戒烟率[相对危险度(RR)=2.4,95%可信区间1.7 - 3.6;风险差值(RD)=0.11,95%可信区间0.07 - 0.15]。去甲替林与安慰剂在疗效上的差异在目标戒烟日期后的头几个月最为明显。然而,随着时间推移,去甲替林组中持续戒烟的人数大幅且显著减少得更快。虽然安非他酮与去甲替林相比导致更高的戒烟率,但差异无统计学意义(RR = 1.7,95%可信区间0.7 - 4.1)。
这项系统评价和荟萃分析表明,与安慰剂治疗相比,使用去甲替林戒烟在至少6个月后导致更高的持续戒烟率。此外,使用去甲替林戒烟耐受性良好且安全。因此,我们认为应建议医疗保健专业人员将去甲替林作为戒烟的一线治疗药物开具,还因为去甲替林的成本比安非他酮缓释剂低得多。