Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, WC1E 6BP, UK.
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BP, UK.
CNS Drugs. 2016 Oct;30(10):951-83. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0362-3.
A wide range of support is available to help smokers to quit and to aid attempts at harm reduction, including three first-line smoking cessation medications: nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline and bupropion. Despite the efficacy of these, there is a continual need to diversify the range of medications so that the needs of tobacco users are met. This paper compares the first-line smoking cessation medications with (1) two variants of these existing products: new galenic formulations of varenicline and novel nicotine delivery devices; and (2) 24 alternative products: cytisine (novel outside Central and Eastern Europe), nortriptyline, other tricyclic antidepressants, electronic cigarettes, clonidine (an anxiolytic), other anxiolytics (e.g. buspirone), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, supplements (e.g. St John's wort), silver acetate, Nicobrevin, modafinil, venlafaxine, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), opioid antagonists, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonists, glucose tablets, selective cannabinoid type 1 receptor antagonists, nicotine vaccines, drugs that affect gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transmission, drugs that affect N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, dopamine agonists (e.g. levodopa), pioglitazone (Actos; OMS405), noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and the weight management drug lorcaserin. Six 'ESCUSE' criteria-relative efficacy, relative safety, relative cost, relative use (overall impact of effective medication use), relative scope (ability to serve new groups of patients) and relative ease of use-are used. Many of these products are in the early stages of clinical trials; however, cytisine looks most promising in having established efficacy and safety with low cost. Electronic cigarettes have become very popular, appear to be efficacious and are safer than smoking, but issues of continued dependence and possible harms need to be considered.
有广泛的支持可帮助吸烟者戒烟并减少危害,包括三种一线戒烟药物:尼古丁替代疗法、伐伦克林和安非他酮。尽管这些药物有效,但仍需要不断多样化药物种类,以满足烟草使用者的需求。本文比较了一线戒烟药物与以下药物:(1)这三种现有产品的两种变体:伐伦克林的新型药剂和新型尼古丁输送装置;以及(2)24 种替代产品:烟碱(东欧和中东以外的新型产品)、去甲替林、其他三环抗抑郁药、电子烟、可乐定(一种抗焦虑药)、其他抗焦虑药(如丁螺环酮)、选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、补充剂(如贯叶连翘)、醋酸银、Nicobrevin、莫达非尼、文拉法辛、单胺氧化酶抑制剂、阿片类拮抗剂、烟碱乙酰胆碱受体拮抗剂、葡萄糖片、选择性大麻素 1 型受体拮抗剂、尼古丁疫苗、影响γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)传递的药物、影响 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体的药物、多巴胺激动剂(如左旋多巴)、吡格列酮(Actos;OMS405)、去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂和体重管理药物lorcaserin。使用了六个“ESCUSE”标准-相对疗效、相对安全性、相对成本、相对使用(有效药物使用的整体影响)、相对范围(为新患者群体服务的能力)和相对易用性。其中许多产品仍处于临床试验的早期阶段;然而,烟碱看起来最有前途,因为它具有成本低、疗效和安全性高的特点。电子烟已变得非常流行,似乎有效且比吸烟更安全,但需要考虑持续依赖和可能存在的危害问题。