• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何阅读医学论文:用于医疗保健领域的研究的批判性评价

How to read a paper: critical appraisal of studies for application in healthcare.

作者信息

Makela M, Witt K

机构信息

Health Technology Assessment at Stakes (Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), P O Box 220, 00531 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2005 Mar;46(3):108-14; quiz 115.

PMID:15735874
Abstract

Finding and using research results to support your professional decisions must be a systematic process, based on the principles of evidence-based medicine and healthcare. This article takes you through a critical appraisal exercise using a recent article from the British Medical Journal as an example. It describes how you decide whether to read and use an article that may be relevant to your decision. The reading is guided by a series of questions. First you evaluate the validity of the article: is the study conducted and reported so that you may trust the results? The second set of questions discusses the outcomes, the effect of the intervention and describes the use of confidence intervals for this. The possibility of using the research results in the reader's setting and patient population is then evaluated.

摘要

寻找并运用研究结果来支持你的专业决策必须是一个基于循证医学和医疗保健原则的系统过程。本文以《英国医学杂志》最近的一篇文章为例,带你进行一次批判性评估练习。它描述了你如何决定是否阅读并使用一篇可能与你的决策相关的文章。阅读由一系列问题引导。首先,你评估文章的有效性:该研究的开展和报告方式是否能让你信任其结果?第二组问题讨论结果、干预措施的效果,并描述置信区间在此方面的运用。然后评估在读者所处环境和患者群体中使用该研究结果的可能性。

相似文献

1
How to read a paper: critical appraisal of studies for application in healthcare.如何阅读医学论文:用于医疗保健领域的研究的批判性评价
Singapore Med J. 2005 Mar;46(3):108-14; quiz 115.
2
Evidence-based medicine, part 5. An introduction to critical appraisal of articles on prognosis.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007 Aug;107(8):315-9.
3
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
4
A journal club is an effective tool for assisting librarians in the practice of evidence-based librarianship: a case study.期刊俱乐部是协助图书馆员践行循证图书馆学的有效工具:一项案例研究。
Health Info Libr J. 2006 Mar;23(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00638.x.
5
Evidence-based medicine, part 2. An introduction to critical appraisal of articles on therapy.循证医学,第2部分。治疗相关文章的批判性评价入门。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007 Aug;107(8):299-303.
6
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
7
Building the powerful 10-minute office visit: Part II. Beginning a critical literature review.打造高效的10分钟门诊:第二部分。开展批判性文献综述。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Jan;111(1):70-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200101000-00012.
8
Revisiting the journal club.重温期刊俱乐部。
Med Teach. 2007 May;29(4):365-70. doi: 10.1080/01421590701477415.
9
Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education.评估医学与医学教育领域的定性研究文章。
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):71-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590400016308.
10
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.介入性疼痛管理中的循证医学、系统评价和指南,第一部分:引言与一般考虑因素
Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Does articaine, rather than lidocaine, increase the risk of nerve damage when administered for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients undergoing local anaesthesia for dental treatment? A mini systematic review of the literature.在局部麻醉下进行牙科治疗的患者中,相较于利多卡因,使用阿替卡因行下牙槽神经阻滞是否会增加神经损伤的风险?文献的小型系统性回顾。
Br Dent J. 2019 Feb 8;226(3):213-223. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.98.
2
The critical appraisal of the papers published in the "iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences", 2007-2010.对《伊朗精神病学与行为科学杂志》2007年至2010年发表论文的批判性评价
Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2013 Fall;7(2):77-82.
3
Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products.
一种用于对天然产物随机对照试验进行批判性评价的工具的开发与评估。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009 Apr 23;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-11.