Ansel B M, Kent R D
Purdue University.
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Apr;35(2):296-308. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3502.296.
This study evaluated the relationship between specific acoustic features of speech and perceptual judgments of word intelligibility of adults with cerebral palsy-dysarthria. Use of a contrasting word task allowed for intelligibility analysis and correlated acoustic analysis according to specified spectral and temporal features. Selected phonemic contrasts included syllable-initial voicing; syllable-final voicing; stop-nasal; fricative-affricate; front-back, high-low, and tense-lax vowels. Speech materials included a set of CVC stimulus words. Acoustic data are reported on vowel duration, formant frequency locations, voice onset times, amplitude rise times, and frication durations. Listeners' perceptual assessment of intelligibility of the 16 dysarthric adults by transcription and rating tasks is also presented. All but one acoustic contrast was successfully made as evidenced by measured acoustic differences between contrast pairs. However, the generally successful acoustic contrasts stood in marked contrast to the poorly rated intelligibility scores and high error percentages that were ascribed to the opposite pair members. A second analysis examined the contribution of these acoustic features towards estimates and prediction of intelligibility deficits in speakers with dysarthria. The scaled intelligibility was predicted by multiple regression analysis with 62.6% accuracy by acoustic measures related to one consonant contrast (fricative-affricate) and three vowel contrasts (front-back, high-low, and tense-lax). Other measured contrasts, such as those related to contrast voicing effects and stop-nasal distinctions, did not seem to contribute in a significant way to variability in the intelligibility estimates. These findings are discussed in relation to specific areas of production deficiency that are consistent across different types of dysarthria with cerebral palsy as the etiology.
本研究评估了脑瘫构音障碍成人的语音特定声学特征与单词可懂度的感知判断之间的关系。使用对比词任务可进行可懂度分析,并根据指定的频谱和时间特征进行相关声学分析。选定的音位对比包括音节起始浊音;音节末尾浊音;塞音-鼻音;擦音-塞擦音;前后、高低和松紧元音。语音材料包括一组CVC刺激词。报告了元音时长、共振峰频率位置、嗓音起始时间、振幅上升时间和擦音时长的声学数据。还介绍了听众通过转录和评分任务对16名构音障碍成人的可懂度进行的感知评估。除了一个声学对比外,其他对比均成功实现,这可通过对比对之间测量到的声学差异得到证明。然而,总体上成功的声学对比与被归因于相反配对成员的低评分可懂度分数和高错误百分比形成了鲜明对比。第二项分析研究了这些声学特征对构音障碍患者可懂度缺陷估计和预测的贡献。通过与一个辅音对比(擦音-塞擦音)和三个元音对比(前后、高低和松紧)相关的声学测量,多元回归分析以62.6%的准确率预测了缩放后的可懂度。其他测量的对比,如与对比浊音效应和塞音-鼻音区别相关的对比,似乎对可懂度估计的变异性没有显著贡献。结合以脑瘫为病因的不同类型构音障碍中一致的特定产生缺陷领域对这些发现进行了讨论。