Balaguer F, Llach J, Castells A, Bordas J M, Ppellisé M, Rodríguez-Moranta F, Mata A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Ginès A, Piqué J M
Department of Gastroenterology, Institut de Malalties Digestives, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02359.x.
The demand for gastrointestinal endoscopy is increasing in most developed countries, resulting in an important rise in overall costs and waiting lists for endoscopic procedures. Therefore, adherence to appropriate indications for these procedures is essential for the rational use of finite resources in an open-access system.
To assess indications and appropriateness of colonoscopy according to the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) criteria.
From May to June 2004, all consecutive patients referred to our Unit for open-access colonoscopy were considered for inclusion in this prospective study. Appropriateness of each colonoscopy was established according to the EPAGE criteria. In order to evaluate whether appropriateness of use correlated with the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy, relevant endoscopic findings were also recorded.
A total of 350 consecutive patients were included in the study. In 38 of them, the colonoscopy indication was not listed in the EPAGE guidelines and, consequently, they were not evaluated. In the remaining 312 patients, the indication for the procedure was considered inappropriate in 73 (23%) patients. Both referring doctor characteristics (specialty and health care setting) and patient data (age) correlated with appropriateness of endoscopy. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher for appropriate colonoscopies (42%) than in those judged inappropriate (21%) (P = 0.001).
A noteworthy proportion of patients referred for colonoscopy to an open-access endoscopy unit are considered inappropriate because of their indication, with significant differences among specialties. These results suggest that implementation of validated guidelines for its appropriate use could improve this situation and, considering the correlation between appropriateness and diagnostic yield, even contribute to improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal diseases.
在大多数发达国家,胃肠道内镜检查的需求不断增加,导致内镜检查的总体成本和等待名单大幅上升。因此,在开放获取系统中合理使用有限资源,坚持这些检查的适当指征至关重要。
根据欧洲胃肠道内镜检查适宜性专家组(EPAGE)标准评估结肠镜检查的指征及适宜性。
2004年5月至6月,所有连续转诊至我院进行开放获取结肠镜检查的患者均纳入本前瞻性研究。根据EPAGE标准确定每次结肠镜检查的适宜性。为了评估使用的适宜性是否与结肠镜检查的诊断率相关,还记录了相关的内镜检查结果。
共有350例连续患者纳入研究。其中38例患者的结肠镜检查指征未列入EPAGE指南,因此未进行评估。在其余312例患者中,73例(23%)患者的检查指征被认为不合适。转诊医生的特征(专业和医疗保健机构)以及患者数据(年龄)均与内镜检查的适宜性相关。适宜的结肠镜检查诊断率(42%)显著高于判断为不适宜的检查(21%)(P = 0.001)。
因指征问题,转诊至开放获取内镜检查单位进行结肠镜检查的患者中有相当比例被认为不适宜,各专业之间存在显著差异。这些结果表明,实施经过验证的合理使用指南可能会改善这种情况,并且考虑到适宜性与诊断率之间的相关性,甚至有助于改善结直肠疾病患者的预后。