Suppr超能文献

欧洲胃肠内镜适宜性小组关于开放式内镜检查单元中结肠镜检查指南的前瞻性研究。

The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study.

作者信息

Balaguer F, Llach J, Castells A, Bordas J M, Ppellisé M, Rodríguez-Moranta F, Mata A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Ginès A, Piqué J M

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Institut de Malalties Digestives, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02359.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for gastrointestinal endoscopy is increasing in most developed countries, resulting in an important rise in overall costs and waiting lists for endoscopic procedures. Therefore, adherence to appropriate indications for these procedures is essential for the rational use of finite resources in an open-access system.

AIM

To assess indications and appropriateness of colonoscopy according to the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) criteria.

METHODS

From May to June 2004, all consecutive patients referred to our Unit for open-access colonoscopy were considered for inclusion in this prospective study. Appropriateness of each colonoscopy was established according to the EPAGE criteria. In order to evaluate whether appropriateness of use correlated with the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy, relevant endoscopic findings were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 350 consecutive patients were included in the study. In 38 of them, the colonoscopy indication was not listed in the EPAGE guidelines and, consequently, they were not evaluated. In the remaining 312 patients, the indication for the procedure was considered inappropriate in 73 (23%) patients. Both referring doctor characteristics (specialty and health care setting) and patient data (age) correlated with appropriateness of endoscopy. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher for appropriate colonoscopies (42%) than in those judged inappropriate (21%) (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A noteworthy proportion of patients referred for colonoscopy to an open-access endoscopy unit are considered inappropriate because of their indication, with significant differences among specialties. These results suggest that implementation of validated guidelines for its appropriate use could improve this situation and, considering the correlation between appropriateness and diagnostic yield, even contribute to improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal diseases.

摘要

背景

在大多数发达国家,胃肠道内镜检查的需求不断增加,导致内镜检查的总体成本和等待名单大幅上升。因此,在开放获取系统中合理使用有限资源,坚持这些检查的适当指征至关重要。

目的

根据欧洲胃肠道内镜检查适宜性专家组(EPAGE)标准评估结肠镜检查的指征及适宜性。

方法

2004年5月至6月,所有连续转诊至我院进行开放获取结肠镜检查的患者均纳入本前瞻性研究。根据EPAGE标准确定每次结肠镜检查的适宜性。为了评估使用的适宜性是否与结肠镜检查的诊断率相关,还记录了相关的内镜检查结果。

结果

共有350例连续患者纳入研究。其中38例患者的结肠镜检查指征未列入EPAGE指南,因此未进行评估。在其余312例患者中,73例(23%)患者的检查指征被认为不合适。转诊医生的特征(专业和医疗保健机构)以及患者数据(年龄)均与内镜检查的适宜性相关。适宜的结肠镜检查诊断率(42%)显著高于判断为不适宜的检查(21%)(P = 0.001)。

结论

因指征问题,转诊至开放获取内镜检查单位进行结肠镜检查的患者中有相当比例被认为不适宜,各专业之间存在显著差异。这些结果表明,实施经过验证的合理使用指南可能会改善这种情况,并且考虑到适宜性与诊断率之间的相关性,甚至有助于改善结直肠疾病患者的预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验