Mansberger Steven L, Johnson Chris A, Cioffi George A, Choi Dongseok, Krishnadas S R, Srinivasan M, Balamurugan V, Kim Usha, Smith Scott D, Wilkins John H, Gritz David C
Devers Eye Institute/Discoveries in Sight, Portland, Oregon 97210, USA.
J Glaucoma. 2005 Apr;14(2):128-34. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000151883.07232.54.
To determine the feasibility and diagnostic precision of Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry as a method to detect glaucoma in rural villages of a developing country.
Cross-sectional study.
Testing included FDT perimetry (C-20-5 screening protocol), tonometry, anterior segment biomicroscopy, and dilated ophthalmoscopy in 296 rural, non-English speaking residents of Southern India over 35 years old. Participants repeated the FDT if they had a location with reduced sensitivity or an unreliable result. We defined an abnormal FDT as one location of reduced sensitivity present on both the initial and repeat examination. We determined the diagnostic precision of FDT separately for a glaucomatous optic disc, a cup to disc ratio (C/D) > or = 0.7, and a C/D > or = 0.8.
Ninety-three percent of subjects were able to complete the test satisfactorily. With repeat FDT testing, 37% of eyes with abnormal FDT results subsequently converted to normal and 67% of eyes with unreliable results subsequently became reliable. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for a glaucomatous optic disc were 7%, 87%, 13%, 76%, and 69%, respectively; for a C/D > or = 0.7, they were 0%, 87%, 0%, 91%, and 81%, respectively; and for a C/D > or = 0.8, they were 0%, 87%, 0%, 99%, and 87%, respectively.
Clinicians can use FDT perimetry to rapidly screen for glaucoma in rural villages of a developing country. FDT testing had high specificity and negative predictive value, but low sensitivity and positive predictive value. The low sensitivity suggests that FDT has limited applicability as the sole test for glaucoma screening in this population. Repeat testing of FDT results that are unreliable or suspected of being abnormal is beneficial for this screening procedure.
确定倍频技术(FDT)视野检查作为一种在发展中国家农村地区检测青光眼方法的可行性和诊断准确性。
横断面研究。
对印度南部296名年龄超过35岁的农村非英语居民进行检测,包括FDT视野检查(C - 20 - 5筛查方案)、眼压测量、眼前节生物显微镜检查和散瞳眼底检查。如果参与者有敏感度降低的部位或结果不可靠,则重复进行FDT检查。我们将异常FDT定义为在初次和重复检查中均存在一个敏感度降低的部位。我们分别针对青光眼性视盘、杯盘比(C/D)≥0.7和C/D≥0.8确定FDT的诊断准确性。
93%的受试者能够满意地完成测试。通过重复FDT检查,37% FDT结果异常的眼睛随后转为正常,67%结果不可靠的眼睛随后变得可靠。对于青光眼性视盘,敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为7%、87%、13%、76%和69%;对于C/D≥0.7,分别为0%、87%、0%、91%和81%;对于C/D≥0.8,分别为0%、87%、0%、99%和87%。
临床医生可以使用FDT视野检查在发展中国家农村地区快速筛查青光眼。FDT检查具有高特异度和阴性预测值,但敏感度和阳性预测值较低。低敏感度表明FDT作为该人群青光眼筛查的唯一检查方法适用性有限。对不可靠或疑似异常的FDT结果进行重复检查对该筛查程序有益。