Rosen Clark A
Department of Otolaryngology, The Eye and Ear Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2005 Mar;115(3):423-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157830.38627.85.
Laryngeal stroboscopy is arguably the most important clinical tool for the evaluation and treatment of patients with voice disorders. Unfortunately, at present, laryngeal stroboscopy is strictly a clinical tool and has no definitive use in the area of voice research. The limitation with laryngeal stroboscopy is the subjective nature of the interpretation of the video examination. A video stroboscopy research tool was developed using 10 stroboscopic parameters selected from the literature and clinical practice. The stroboscopy research tool was validated with the results of 18 reviewers using the instrument to rate 21 unique "cases" and 6 repeated "cases." The results of this video perceptual analysis study identified which parameters were the most robust and reliable across a wide range of reviewers and validated power analysis curves for future similar research. Furthermore, findings from this study revealed that a greater than 80% intra-rater reliability is the preferred method for the selection of a valid and reliable reviewer. Future research using this instrument will most likely increase the reliability and utility of the instrument with the use of prestudy reviewer training and/or the use of video examples to serve as anchors or external references.
频闪喉镜检查可以说是评估和治疗嗓音障碍患者最重要的临床工具。不幸的是,目前频闪喉镜检查严格来说只是一种临床工具,在嗓音研究领域并无确切用途。频闪喉镜检查的局限性在于视频检查结果解读的主观性。利用从文献和临床实践中选取的10个频闪参数开发了一种频闪喉镜研究工具。18名评审人员使用该工具对21个独特“病例”和6个重复“病例”进行评分,以此对该频闪喉镜研究工具进行了验证。这项视频感知分析研究的结果确定了在众多评审人员中哪些参数最为稳健可靠,并为未来类似研究验证了功效分析曲线。此外,该研究结果表明,评分者内部信度大于80%是选择有效且可靠评审人员的首选方法。使用该工具的未来研究很可能会通过开展研究前评审人员培训和/或使用视频示例作为参照标准或外部参考,提高该工具的可靠性和实用性。