• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度头部损伤:再探讨

Mild head injury: revisited.

作者信息

Thiruppathy S P, Muthukumar N

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Madurai Medical College, Madurai, India.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Oct;146(10):1075-82; discussion 1082-3. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0335-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-004-0335-z
PMID:15744844
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

  1. To define the incidence of positive CT scans in patients with different grades of mild head injury (MHI), 2. To identify clinical predictors of positive CT scans, 3. To evaluate the usefulness of plain radiographs in the triage of patients with MHI, 4. To evaluate frequency and nature of surgical intervention in MHI, 5. To evaluate the risk of deterioration in MHI, and 6. To find out whether patients with normal neurological examination and normal CT can be safely discharged.

METHODS

In a prospective study conducted over a period of four months in our center, all patients with mild head injury (defined as Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) 13-15) were admitted to the head injury unit. Patients underwent standard clinical examination, skull radiography and cranial CT. No clinical criteria were used to select patients for CT scanning and all the patients were subjected to CT. Patients with negative findings on CT and a normal neurological examination were discharged after 24 hours of observation. Patients with positive findings on cranial CT were treated either medically or surgically as deemed necessary. Outcome measures included safe discharge, clinical deterioration, need for surgical intervention or death. The following factors were analyzed statistically to find out whether they can be used as predictive factors for positive cranial CT. They were: age, sex, mode of injury, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic seizures, ear/ nose/throat bleeding, vomiting, admission GCS score, scalp injury, polytrauma, focal neurological deficit, fractures visualized on skull radiography.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty one patients were included in the study. Of these males constituted 63%, females 17% and children 20%. RTA was the most common mode of injury. Seventy five percent of the patients had GCS of 15, 15% had GCS of 14 and 10% had GCS of 13. Thirty eight percent of the patients had positive findings on the CT. Age, mode of injury, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic seizures, ENT bleeding, vomiting, scalp injury and polytrauma were not found to be predictors of positive CT. Admission GCS score, focal neurological deficits, and fractures detected by skull radiography were found to be statistically significant predictors of positive findings on CT. Seven percent of patients required surgical intervention. Six percent of patients showed neurological deterioration and there was one death in this series of MHI patients. Patients with multiple lesions on CT had a higher chance of deterioration than those with a single lesion. No patient who had a GCS of 15 and normal CT developed any complication during the hospital stay or after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of positive CT scans in this prospective, consecutive, unselected cohort of MHI patients was 38%. Lower admission GCS scores, focal neurological deficits, and fractures detected by skull x-rays were found to be significant predictors of positive CT. Other clinical parameters were not found to be predictors of positive CT. CT was found to be superior to plain x-rays in detecting skull fractures. Seven percent of this cohort required neurosurgical intervention. Six percent showed neurological deterioration and there was one death in this series. Patients with multiple lesions on CT had a higher chance of deterioration than those with single lesions. The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in patients with positive CT. As no patient with a normal neurological examination and a normal CT deteriorated, we believe these patients can be safely discharged without need for admission and observation.

摘要

目的

  1. 确定不同程度轻度颅脑损伤(MHI)患者CT扫描阳性的发生率;2. 识别CT扫描阳性的临床预测因素;3. 评估X线平片在MHI患者分诊中的作用;4. 评估MHI患者手术干预的频率和性质;5. 评估MHI患者病情恶化的风险;6. 确定神经检查和CT均正常的患者是否可安全出院。

方法

在我们中心进行的一项为期四个月的前瞻性研究中,所有轻度颅脑损伤患者(定义为格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)13 - 15分)均收入颅脑损伤病房。患者接受标准临床检查、颅骨X线检查和头颅CT检查。未采用临床标准来选择进行CT扫描的患者,所有患者均接受CT检查。CT检查结果阴性且神经检查正常的患者在观察24小时后出院。头颅CT检查结果阳性的患者根据需要进行药物或手术治疗。观察指标包括安全出院、临床病情恶化、是否需要手术干预或死亡。对以下因素进行统计学分析,以确定它们是否可作为头颅CT阳性的预测因素。这些因素包括:年龄、性别、损伤方式、意识丧失、创伤后癫痫发作、耳/鼻/喉出血、呕吐、入院时GCS评分、头皮损伤、多发伤、局灶性神经功能缺损、颅骨X线检查可见的骨折。

结果

381例患者纳入研究。其中男性占63%,女性占17%,儿童占20%。道路交通伤(RTA)是最常见的损伤方式。75%的患者GCS评分为15分,15%的患者GCS评分为14分,10%的患者GCS评分为13分。38%的患者CT检查结果阳性。年龄、损伤方式、意识丧失、创伤后癫痫发作、耳鼻喉出血、呕吐、头皮损伤和多发伤未被发现是CT阳性的预测因素。入院时GCS评分、局灶性神经功能缺损以及颅骨X线检查发现的骨折在统计学上是CT阳性结果的显著预测因素。7%的患者需要手术干预。6%的患者出现神经功能恶化,在这组MHI患者中有1例死亡。CT上有多处损伤的患者比单一损伤的患者病情恶化的可能性更高。GCS评分为15分且CT正常的患者在住院期间或出院后均未出现任何并发症。

结论

在这个前瞻性、连续性、未选择的MHI患者队列中,CT扫描阳性的发生率为38%。较低的入院GCS评分、局灶性神经功能缺损以及颅骨X线检查发现的骨折是CT阳性的显著预测因素。其他临床参数未被发现是CT阳性的预测因素。CT在检测颅骨骨折方面优于X线平片。该队列中有7%的患者需要神经外科干预。6%的患者出现神经功能恶化,这组中有1例死亡。CT上有多处损伤的患者比单一损伤的患者病情恶化的可能性更高。CT阳性的患者住院时间延长。由于没有神经检查和CT均正常的患者病情恶化,我们认为这些患者无需入院观察即可安全出院。

相似文献

1
Mild head injury: revisited.轻度头部损伤:再探讨
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Oct;146(10):1075-82; discussion 1082-3. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0335-z.
2
Risk factors indicating the need for cranial CT scans in elderly patients with head trauma: an Austrian trial and comparison with the Canadian CT Head Rule.提示老年头部创伤患者需行颅脑 CT 扫描的风险因素:奥地利试验及与加拿大 CT 头部规则的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;120(2):447-52. doi: 10.3171/2013.10.JNS13726. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
3
A prospective evaluation of the value of repeat cranial computed tomography in patients with minimal head injury and an intracranial bleed.对轻度头部损伤合并颅内出血患者重复进行头颅计算机断层扫描价值的前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):862-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000224225.54982.90.
4
The use of CT scanning to triage patients requiring admission following minimal head injury.使用CT扫描对轻度头部受伤后需要住院治疗的患者进行分诊。
J Trauma. 1991 Apr;31(4):483-7; discussion 487-9.
5
Predictors of positive CT scans in the trauma patient with minor head injury.轻度颅脑损伤创伤患者CT扫描阳性的预测因素。
Am Surg. 1994 Jul;60(7):533-5; discussion 535-6.
6
Role of repeat CT in mild to moderate head injury: an institutional study.重复 CT 在轻度至中度头部损伤中的作用:一项机构研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19527.
7
Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.成人和儿童轻微头部损伤的诊断管理策略:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(27):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15270.
8
Minimal head injury: is admission necessary?轻度头部损伤:是否需要入院治疗?
Am Surg. 1991 Jan;57(1):14-7.
9
Pediatric minor head trauma: indications for computed tomographic scanning revisited.小儿轻度头部外伤:重新审视计算机断层扫描的指征
J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2):231-7; discussion 237-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200108000-00004.
10
The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries.计算机断层扫描和神经学检查在轻度头部损伤患者管理中的临床效用。
J Trauma. 1992 Sep;33(3):385-94. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199209000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Diagnostic Strategies for Concussion-Related Vision Disorders: A Review.脑震荡相关视觉障碍的最佳诊断策略:综述
Eye Brain. 2025 May 12;17:27-36. doi: 10.2147/EB.S492854. eCollection 2025.
2
Early Discharge versus 6-hour Observation in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with Normal Brain CT Scan; a Comparative Pilot study of Outcomes.脑CT扫描正常的轻度创伤性脑损伤患者早期出院与6小时观察的比较;一项结局的对比性初步研究
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 May 18;12(1):e50. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2245. eCollection 2024.
3
Efficacy of the Canadian CT Head Rule in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Minor Head Injury.
加拿大头颅CT检查规则在因轻度头部损伤就诊于急诊科患者中的有效性。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb;28(2):148-151. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24620.
4
Statistical Analysis to Find out the Optimal Locations for Non Invasive Brain Stimulation.统计分析找出非侵入性脑刺激的最佳位置。
J Med Syst. 2020 Mar 12;44(4):85. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-1535-7.
5
Computed Tomography Profile and its Utilization in Head Injury Patients in Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.计算机断层扫描概况及其在急诊科颅脑损伤患者中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):25-30. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_112_17.
6
[Mild head injury].[轻度头部损伤]
Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Jan 22;9(Suppl 1):S16-S28. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_371_17. eCollection 2018.
7
Diagnostic Utility of Conventional Radiography in Head Injury.传统X线摄影在头部损伤中的诊断效用
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):TC13-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13842.6133. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
8
Neuropsychological outcome and diffusion tensor imaging in complicated versus uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury.复杂型与非复杂型轻度创伤性脑损伤的神经心理学结果及弥散张量成像
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0122746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122746. eCollection 2015.
9
Clinically-important brain injury and CT findings in pediatric mild traumatic brain injuries: a prospective study in a Chinese reference hospital.小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤的临床重要性脑损伤及CT表现:在中国一家参考医院进行的前瞻性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Mar 26;11(4):3493-506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110403493.
10
Outcome from Complicated versus Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.复杂型与非复杂型轻度创伤性脑损伤的预后
Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:415740. doi: 10.1155/2012/415740. Epub 2012 Apr 19.