Maskell Nicholas A, Davies Christopher W H, Nunn Andrew J, Hedley Emma L, Gleeson Fergus V, Miller Robert, Gabe Rhian, Rees Glyn L, Peto Timothy E A, Woodhead Mark A, Lane Donald J, Darbyshire Janet H, Davies Robert J O
Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital Site, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):865-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042473.
Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents are used in the drainage of infected pleural-fluid collections. This use is based on small trials that did not have the statistical power to evaluate accurately important clinical outcomes, including safety. We conducted a trial to clarify the therapeutic role of intrapleural streptokinase.
In this double-blind trial, 454 patients with pleural infection (defined by the presence of purulent pleural fluid or pleural fluid with a pH below 7.2 with signs of infection or by proven bacterial invasion of the pleural space) were randomly assigned to receive either intrapleural streptokinase (250,000 IU twice daily for three days) or placebo. Patients received antibiotics and underwent chest-tube drainage, surgery, and other treatment as part of routine care. The number of patients in the two groups who had died or needed surgical drainage at three months was compared (the primary end point); secondary end points were the rates of death and of surgery (analyzed separately), the radiographic outcome, and the length of the hospital stay.
The groups were well matched at baseline. Among the 427 patients who received streptokinase or placebo, there was no significant difference between the groups in the proportion of patients who died or needed surgery (with streptokinase: 64 of 206 patients [31 percent]; with placebo: 60 of 221 [27 percent]; relative risk, 1.14 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.54; P=0.43), a result that excluded a clinically significant benefit of streptokinase. There was no benefit to streptokinase in terms of mortality, rate of surgery, radiographic outcomes, or length of the hospital stay. Serious adverse events (chest pain, fever, or allergy) were more common with streptokinase (7 percent, vs. 3 percent with placebo; relative risk, 2.49 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.98 to 6.36]; P=0.08).
The intrapleural administration of streptokinase does not improve mortality, the rate of surgery, or the length of the hospital stay among patients with pleural infection.
胸膜内使用纤维蛋白溶解剂用于感染性胸腔积液的引流。这种用法基于一些小型试验,这些试验没有足够的统计效力来准确评估包括安全性在内的重要临床结局。我们开展了一项试验以阐明胸膜内链激酶的治疗作用。
在这项双盲试验中,454例胸膜感染患者(根据存在脓性胸腔积液或pH低于7.2且有感染迹象的胸腔积液,或经证实细菌侵入胸膜腔来定义)被随机分配接受胸膜内链激酶(250,000国际单位,每日两次,共三天)或安慰剂。患者接受抗生素治疗,并作为常规治疗的一部分接受胸腔闭式引流、手术及其他治疗。比较两组在三个月时死亡或需要手术引流的患者数量(主要终点);次要终点为死亡率和手术率(分别分析)、影像学结局及住院时间。
两组在基线时匹配良好。在接受链激酶或安慰剂的427例患者中,两组在死亡或需要手术的患者比例上无显著差异(链激酶组:206例患者中有64例[31%];安慰剂组:221例中有60例[27%];相对风险,1.14[95%置信区间,0.85至1.54;P=0.43]),这一结果排除了链激酶具有临床显著益处的可能性。链激酶在死亡率、手术率、影像学结局或住院时间方面均无益处。严重不良事件(胸痛、发热或过敏)在链激酶组更常见(7%,安慰剂组为3%;相对风险,2.49[95%置信区间,0.98至6.36];P=0.08)。
胸膜内注射链激酶并不能改善胸膜感染患者的死亡率、手术率或住院时间。