• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1991年至2002年期间1期肿瘤学试验的风险与益处

Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.

作者信息

Horstmann Elizabeth, McCabe Mary S, Grochow Louise, Yamamoto Seiichiro, Rubinstein Larry, Budd Troy, Shoemaker Dale, Emanuel Ezekiel J, Grady Christine

机构信息

Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md 20892-1156, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):895-904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042220.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa042220
PMID:15745980
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous reviews of phase 1 oncology trials reported a rate of response to treatment of 4 to 6 percent and a toxicity-related death rate of 0.5 percent. These results may not reflect the rates in current phase 1 oncology trials.

METHODS

We reviewed all nonpediatric phase 1 oncology trials sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute between 1991 and 2002. We report the rates of response to treatment, of stable disease, of grade 4 toxic events, and of treatment-related deaths.

RESULTS

We analyzed 460 trials involving 11,935 participants, all of whom were assessed for toxicity and 10,402 of whom were assessed for a response to therapy. The overall response rate (i.e., for both complete and partial responses) was 10.6 percent, with considerable variation among trials. "Classic" phase 1 trials of single investigational chemotherapeutic agents represented only 20 percent of the trials and had a response rate of 4.4 percent. Studies that included at least one anticancer agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration constituted 46.3 percent of the trials and had a response rate of 17.8. An additional 34.1 percent of participants had stable disease or a less-than-partial response. The overall rate of death due to toxic events was 0.49 percent. Of 3465 participants for whom data on patient-specific grade 4 toxic events were available, 14.3 percent had had at least one episode of grade 4 toxic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall response rates among phase 1 oncology trials are higher than previously reported, although they have not changed for classic phase 1 trials, and toxicity-related death rates have remained stable. Rates of response and toxicity vary, however, among the various types of phase 1 oncology trials.

摘要

背景

先前对1期肿瘤学试验的综述报告称,治疗缓解率为4%至6%,毒性相关死亡率为0.5%。这些结果可能无法反映当前1期肿瘤学试验中的发生率。

方法

我们回顾了1991年至2002年间由美国国立癌症研究所癌症治疗评估项目赞助的所有非儿科1期肿瘤学试验。我们报告了治疗缓解率、疾病稳定率、4级毒性事件发生率和治疗相关死亡率。

结果

我们分析了460项试验,涉及11935名参与者,所有参与者均接受了毒性评估,其中10402名接受了治疗反应评估。总体缓解率(即完全缓解和部分缓解)为10.6%,各试验之间存在相当大的差异。单一研究性化疗药物的“经典”1期试验仅占试验的20%,缓解率为4.4%。至少包含一种美国食品药品监督管理局批准的抗癌药物的研究占试验的46.3%,缓解率为17.8%。另外34.1%的参与者疾病稳定或缓解程度低于部分缓解。毒性事件导致的总体死亡率为0.49%。在有患者特异性4级毒性事件数据的3465名参与者中,14.3%至少发生过一次4级毒性事件。

结论

1期肿瘤学试验的总体缓解率高于先前报告的水平,尽管经典1期试验的缓解率没有变化,且毒性相关死亡率保持稳定。然而,不同类型的1期肿瘤学试验的缓解率和毒性存在差异。

相似文献

1
Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.1991年至2002年期间1期肿瘤学试验的风险与益处
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):895-904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042220.
2
Risks and benefits associated with novel phase 1 oncology trial designs.与新型1期肿瘤学试验设计相关的风险和益处。
Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):1115-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22878.
3
Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.抗肿瘤药物一期试验中的治疗反应。
Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Sep;70(9):1105-15.
4
Descriptions of benefits and risks in consent forms for phase 1 oncology trials.1期肿瘤学试验知情同意书中的获益与风险描述。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 26;347(26):2134-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021182.
5
The Challenge of Developing New Therapies for Childhood Cancers.开发儿童癌症新疗法面临的挑战。
Oncologist. 1997;2(1):I-II.
6
A clinical development paradigm for cancer vaccines and related biologics.癌症疫苗及相关生物制品的临床开发模式。
J Immunother. 2007 Jan;30(1):1-15. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000211341.88835.ae.
7
Survival and prognostic factors in lung cancer patients treated in phase I trials: Japanese experience.肺癌患者在I期试验中的生存及预后因素:日本经验
Int J Oncol. 1999 Oct;15(4):737-41.
8
Presentation and subsequent publication rates of phase I oncology clinical trials.I期肿瘤学临床试验的呈现及后续发表率。
Cancer. 2005 Oct 1;104(7):1497-504. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21337.
9
Pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate.培美曲塞:一种多靶点抗叶酸药物。
Clin Ther. 2005 Sep;27(9):1343-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.09.010.
10
Lapatinib: a dual inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases.拉帕替尼:一种人表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶的双重抑制剂。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1426-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the risks and benefits of investigational new drugs in adult phase-I oncology trials in China, 2013-2021.评估2013 - 2021年中国成人I期肿瘤试验中新型研究药物的风险与获益
Invest New Drugs. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10637-025-01560-5.
2
Clinical potential of antibody-drug conjugates in early-phase clinical trials for late-line treatment of advanced solid tumors.抗体药物偶联物在晚期实体瘤后线治疗早期临床试验中的临床潜力。
Invest New Drugs. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10637-025-01576-x.
3
A single centre experience of patients with rare cancers referred for early phase clinical trials.
一项针对被转诊至早期临床试验的罕见癌症患者的单中心经验。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13934-2.
4
Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer.用于指导复发或转移性癌症患者进行匹配靶向治疗的下一代测序技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 24;3(3):CD014872. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014872.pub2.
5
Relevance, Risks, and Benefits of Early-Phases Clinical Trials Participations for Patients With Hematological Malignancies From 2008 to 2023.2008年至2023年血液系统恶性肿瘤患者参与早期临床试验的相关性、风险和益处
Eur J Haematol. 2025 Jan;114(1):89-97. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14307. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
6
What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?肿瘤临床研究的症结在哪里?我们能解决吗?
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 28;31(7):3738-3751. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070275.
7
The Faces of Financial Toxicity: A Qualitative Interview Study of Financial Toxicity in Advanced Cancer Patients in Phase I Oncology Trials.财务毒性的面貌:一项关于一期肿瘤试验中晚期癌症患者财务毒性的定性访谈研究。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Nov 15;7(6):524-533. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.003. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for Asian patients in Phase I clinical trials.I 期临床试验中亚洲患者的临床结果和预后因素。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Apr;128(8):1514-1520. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02193-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
9
Early drug development in solid tumours: analysis of National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase 1 trials.实体瘤的早期药物开发:美国国家癌症研究所资助的 I 期临床试验分析。
Lancet. 2022 Aug 13;400(10351):512-521. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01390-3.
10
The 'false hope' argument in discussions on expanded access to investigational drugs: a critical assessment.讨论扩大试验性药物的获取途径时的“虚假希望”论点:批判性评估。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10106-y. Epub 2022 Aug 11.