• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗肿瘤药物一期试验中的治疗反应。

Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.

作者信息

Estey E, Hoth D, Simon R, Marsoni S, Leyland-Jones B, Wittes R

出版信息

Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Sep;70(9):1105-15.

PMID:3527410
Abstract

We analyzed the therapeutic effect reported in 187 phase I trials of 54 anticancer drugs introduced into National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trial from 1974 to 1982. An additional 12 drugs entering clinical trial prior to 1974 were also examined. Objective responses (partial and complete) were reported in 271 of the 6447 patients (4.2%). Thirty-nine percent of the patients were treated at an initial dose level greater than or equal to the dose ultimately recommended for phase II trials. Patients in phase I trials generally had adequate performance status (Karnofsky scale greater than 80% or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0, 1, or 2). More than 90% of the patients had received prior chemotherapy. We next examined the therapeutic effect observed in phase II trials for each of the drugs. Thirty-eight of the 54 drugs had completed at least one phase II trial. Twenty-one drugs were rated active, and nine were rated inactive. For the drugs entering clinical trial since 1974, the median phase I response rate for those active in phase II was 4.3%, compared to 2.7% for the drugs not found active in phase II. This difference was not statistically significant. The tabulated response rate in phase I trials reported here should be interpreted cautiously. There are many factors which may contribute to significant variability in the reported response rates, including the heterogeneity of patient population with respect to prior therapy and tumor type, lack of requirement for measurable/evaluable disease on entry into many studies, and variations in the rigor with which tumor sites are followed for response. These factors may lead to either an overestimate or underestimate of the true response rate in phase I. Although little therapeutic effect is produced in phase I, we discuss several measures which might increase patient benefit during these trials.

摘要

我们分析了1974年至1982年引入美国国立癌症研究所赞助的临床试验中的54种抗癌药物的187项I期试验报告的治疗效果。还检查了1974年之前进入临床试验的另外12种药物。6447例患者中有271例(4.2%)报告有客观缓解(部分缓解和完全缓解)。39%的患者接受的初始剂量水平大于或等于最终推荐用于II期试验的剂量。I期试验中的患者一般身体状况良好(卡诺夫斯基量表评分大于80%或东部肿瘤协作组0、1或2级)。超过90%的患者曾接受过化疗。接下来,我们检查了每种药物在II期试验中观察到的治疗效果。54种药物中有38种完成了至少一项II期试验。21种药物被评为有效,9种被评为无效。对于1974年以来进入临床试验的药物,II期有活性的药物的I期缓解率中位数为4.3%,而II期无活性的药物为2.7%。这种差异无统计学意义。此处报告的I期试验列表缓解率应谨慎解读。有许多因素可能导致报告的缓解率存在显著差异,包括患者群体在前治疗和肿瘤类型方面的异质性、许多研究在入组时对可测量/可评估疾病无要求,以及随访肿瘤部位以评估缓解情况时的严格程度差异。这些因素可能导致对I期真实缓解率的高估或低估。尽管I期产生的治疗效果很小,但我们讨论了几种可能在这些试验中增加患者获益的措施。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.抗肿瘤药物一期试验中的治疗反应。
Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Sep;70(9):1105-15.
2
Clinical drug development: an analysis of phase II trials, 1970-1985.临床药物研发:1970 - 1985年II期试验分析
Cancer Treat Rep. 1987 Jan;71(1):71-80.
3
The Challenge of Developing New Therapies for Childhood Cancers.开发儿童癌症新疗法面临的挑战。
Oncologist. 1997;2(1):I-II.
4
Anticancer Drug Development: The Way Forward.抗癌药物研发:前进之路
Oncologist. 1996;1(3):180-181.
5
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
6
Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.分子靶向药物研究中使用的II期试验设计综述:III期试验的结果及成功预测因素
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1346-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5913. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
7
Gd-Tex Pharmacyclics Inc.吉利德 - 德克斯制药公司(Gd-Tex Pharmacyclics Inc.) 需注意,“Gd-Tex”这种表述可能不太准确,也许是特定的名称缩写,若有更准确的背景信息,翻译会更精准。这里暂且按字面近似翻译。
Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2000 Dec;1(4):524-8.
8
Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.1991年至2002年期间1期肿瘤学试验的风险与益处
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):895-904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042220.
9
How large should a phase II trial of a new drug be?一种新药的II期试验应该有多大规模?
Cancer Treat Rep. 1987 Nov;71(11):1079-85.
10
[New oral anticancer drug, TS-1 (S-1)--from bench to clinic].新型口服抗癌药物TS-1(S-1)——从实验室到临床
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2001 Jun;28(6):855-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Dose Finding in Oncology Trials Guided by Ordinal Toxicity Grades Using Continuous Dose Levels.使用连续剂量水平,依据序贯毒性分级指导肿瘤学试验中的剂量探索。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Aug 14;26(8):687. doi: 10.3390/e26080687.
2
Early drug development in solid tumours: analysis of National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase 1 trials.实体瘤的早期药物开发:美国国家癌症研究所资助的 I 期临床试验分析。
Lancet. 2022 Aug 13;400(10351):512-521. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01390-3.
3
Trends in Grade 5 Toxicity and Response in Phase I Trials in Hematologic Malignancy: 20-Year Experience From the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute.
血液系统恶性肿瘤I期试验中5级毒性和反应的趋势:美国国立癌症研究所癌症治疗评估项目20年经验
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 10;40(17):1949-1957. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02190. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Acceptable Risks in Pediatric Research: Views of the US Public.儿科研究中的可接受风险:美国公众的观点。
Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052687.
5
Do the Potential Medical Benefits of Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Trials Justify the Risks? Views of the United States Public.一期儿科肿瘤试验的潜在医学益处是否能证明其风险合理?美国公众的观点。
J Pediatr. 2021 Nov;238:249-258.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Therapeutic outcome of early-phase clinical trials in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.多发性骨髓瘤早期临床试验的治疗结果:一项荟萃分析。
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Mar 1;11(3):44. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00441-3.
7
Clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients treated in phase I clinical trials at University of Colorado Cancer Center.科罗拉多大学癌症中心 I 期临床试验中治疗的乳腺癌患者的临床结局。
Cancer Med. 2020 Dec;9(23):8801-8808. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3487. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
8
Current status of MEK inhibitors in the treatment of plexiform neurofibromas.MEK抑制剂在丛状神经纤维瘤治疗中的现状
Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Oct;36(10):2443-2452. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04731-2. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
9
Reprioritizing Risk and Benefit: The Future of Study Design in Early-Phase Cancer Research.重新评估风险与获益:早期癌症研究中研究设计的未来
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Nov;41(6):2-11. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500033.
10
Phase I trials as valid therapeutic options for patients with cancer.I 期临床试验是癌症患者有效的治疗选择。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;16(12):773-778. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0262-9. Epub 2019 Sep 2.