Suppr超能文献

抗肿瘤药物一期试验中的治疗反应。

Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.

作者信息

Estey E, Hoth D, Simon R, Marsoni S, Leyland-Jones B, Wittes R

出版信息

Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Sep;70(9):1105-15.

PMID:3527410
Abstract

We analyzed the therapeutic effect reported in 187 phase I trials of 54 anticancer drugs introduced into National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trial from 1974 to 1982. An additional 12 drugs entering clinical trial prior to 1974 were also examined. Objective responses (partial and complete) were reported in 271 of the 6447 patients (4.2%). Thirty-nine percent of the patients were treated at an initial dose level greater than or equal to the dose ultimately recommended for phase II trials. Patients in phase I trials generally had adequate performance status (Karnofsky scale greater than 80% or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0, 1, or 2). More than 90% of the patients had received prior chemotherapy. We next examined the therapeutic effect observed in phase II trials for each of the drugs. Thirty-eight of the 54 drugs had completed at least one phase II trial. Twenty-one drugs were rated active, and nine were rated inactive. For the drugs entering clinical trial since 1974, the median phase I response rate for those active in phase II was 4.3%, compared to 2.7% for the drugs not found active in phase II. This difference was not statistically significant. The tabulated response rate in phase I trials reported here should be interpreted cautiously. There are many factors which may contribute to significant variability in the reported response rates, including the heterogeneity of patient population with respect to prior therapy and tumor type, lack of requirement for measurable/evaluable disease on entry into many studies, and variations in the rigor with which tumor sites are followed for response. These factors may lead to either an overestimate or underestimate of the true response rate in phase I. Although little therapeutic effect is produced in phase I, we discuss several measures which might increase patient benefit during these trials.

摘要

我们分析了1974年至1982年引入美国国立癌症研究所赞助的临床试验中的54种抗癌药物的187项I期试验报告的治疗效果。还检查了1974年之前进入临床试验的另外12种药物。6447例患者中有271例(4.2%)报告有客观缓解(部分缓解和完全缓解)。39%的患者接受的初始剂量水平大于或等于最终推荐用于II期试验的剂量。I期试验中的患者一般身体状况良好(卡诺夫斯基量表评分大于80%或东部肿瘤协作组0、1或2级)。超过90%的患者曾接受过化疗。接下来,我们检查了每种药物在II期试验中观察到的治疗效果。54种药物中有38种完成了至少一项II期试验。21种药物被评为有效,9种被评为无效。对于1974年以来进入临床试验的药物,II期有活性的药物的I期缓解率中位数为4.3%,而II期无活性的药物为2.7%。这种差异无统计学意义。此处报告的I期试验列表缓解率应谨慎解读。有许多因素可能导致报告的缓解率存在显著差异,包括患者群体在前治疗和肿瘤类型方面的异质性、许多研究在入组时对可测量/可评估疾病无要求,以及随访肿瘤部位以评估缓解情况时的严格程度差异。这些因素可能导致对I期真实缓解率的高估或低估。尽管I期产生的治疗效果很小,但我们讨论了几种可能在这些试验中增加患者获益的措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验