• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

承受拉力的陶瓷托槽结扎翼的断裂强度。

Fracture strength of ceramic bracket tie wings subjected to tension.

作者信息

Johnson Gerald, Walker Mary P, Kula Katherine

机构信息

Department Head, Orthodontics, US Navy, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):95-100. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0095:FSOCBT>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0095:FSOCBT>2.0.CO;2
PMID:15747822
Abstract

One of the most common areas of ceramic bracket fracture is within the tie-wing complex. When an archwire is ligated into position, tensile forces are placed under the tie wing. However, no study, to date, has focused specifically on the fracture resistance of the tie-wing complex. The aim of this study is to compare the tensile fracture strength of seven currently available ceramic brackets (Inspire, Fascination, Mystique, InVu, Clarity, Virage, and Luxi) as a function of bracket brand and bracket configuration, semitwin vs true-twin. Based on a power analysis of pilot data, 10 maxillary central incisor brackets per group were tested to failure with a tensile load placed directly under the distoincisal tie wing. The results ranged from a maximum mean fracture strength of 147.71 (5.87) MPa with Fascination brackets to a minimum mean fracture strength of 84.28 (7.01) MPa with Luxi brackets. The statistical analysis indicated a significant effect on fracture strength as a function of bracket brand (P < .05) and that semitwin brackets, Fascination, Mystique, and Virage, had significantly higher fracture strength than true-twin brackets, Clarity, lnVu, and Luxi (P < .05). Interestingly, the only monocrystalline bracket in the study, Inspire, could not be fractured using the investigation protocol. In fact, the steel ligature fixture wire would break before tie-wing fracture at a mean fixture failure of 198.65 MPa.

摘要

陶瓷托槽骨折最常见的部位之一是在结扎翼复合体内部。当将弓丝结扎到位时,结扎翼下方会受到拉力。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究专门关注结扎翼复合体的抗骨折性。本研究的目的是比较七种市售陶瓷托槽(Inspire、Fascination、Mystique、InVu、Clarity、Virage和Luxi)的拉伸断裂强度,作为托槽品牌和托槽构型(半孪生与全孪生)的函数。根据前期数据的功效分析,每组测试10个上颌中切牙托槽直至失效,拉伸载荷直接施加于远中切缘结扎翼下方。结果显示,Fascination托槽的最大平均断裂强度为147.71(5.87)MPa,Luxi托槽的最小平均断裂强度为84.28(7.01)MPa。统计分析表明,托槽品牌对断裂强度有显著影响(P < 0.05),半孪生托槽Fascination、Mystique和Virage的断裂强度显著高于全孪生托槽Clarity、InVu和Luxi(P < 0.05)。有趣的是,本研究中唯一的单晶托槽Inspire,按照研究方案无法使其骨折。实际上,在平均固定失效强度为198.65 MPa时,结扎固定丝会在结扎翼骨折之前断裂。

相似文献

1
Fracture strength of ceramic bracket tie wings subjected to tension.承受拉力的陶瓷托槽结扎翼的断裂强度。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):95-100. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0095:FSOCBT>2.0.CO;2.
2
Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.在模拟临床环境中,不同脱粘技术对陶瓷托槽脱粘力和失效模式的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov;132(5):680-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.035.
3
Fluoride prophylactic agents effect on ceramic bracket tie-wing fracture strength.氟化物预防剂对陶瓷托槽结扎翼断裂强度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):524-30. doi: 10.2319/052707-250.1.
4
Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.新型陶瓷托槽的粘结强度与脱粘特性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):761-5; quiz 802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.041.
5
Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.陶瓷和聚碳酸酯托槽脱粘后的失败特征及粘结强度评估:托槽基底硅烷化的影响
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):176-82. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm100. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
6
Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.陶瓷托槽的替代方案:两种美观托槽与不锈钢箔网托槽底座的体外拉伸粘结强度比较
Br J Orthod. 1997 May;24(2):133-7. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.2.133.
7
Testing the tensile fracture strength tie-wings of different orthodontic ceramic bracket using an Instron machine.使用英斯特朗材料试验机测试不同正畸陶瓷托槽的抗拉断裂强度翼。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Dec;35(8):1048-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.020. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Ceramic bracket fracture resistance to second order arch wire activations.陶瓷托槽对二级弓丝激活的抗断裂性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Nov;106(5):481-6. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70070-2.
9
Fracture strengths of ceramic brackets subjected to mesial-distal archwire tipping forces.承受近远中弓丝倾斜力的陶瓷托槽的断裂强度。
Angle Orthod. 1992 Spring;62(1):67-76. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1992)062<0067:FSOCBS>2.0.CO;2.
10
Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics.不同基底设计的陶瓷托槽与铝酸锂陶瓷和氟磷灰石陶瓷的粘结强度。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):87-93. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp055. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Mechanical and Clinical Properties of Customized Orthodontic Bracket Systems-A Comprehensive Review.定制正畸托槽系统的力学和临床性能——综述
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Oct 7;15(10):299. doi: 10.3390/jfb15100299.
2
Testing the tensile fracture strength tie-wings of different orthodontic ceramic bracket using an Instron machine.使用英斯特朗材料试验机测试不同正畸陶瓷托槽的抗拉断裂强度翼。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Dec;35(8):1048-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.020. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Dimensional accuracy, mechanical property, and optical stability of zirconia orthodontic bracket according to yttria proportions.
根据氧化钇比例的氧化锆正畸托槽的尺寸精度、机械性能和光学稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47827-w.
4
Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.正畸陶瓷托槽不同脱粘和修复方法再利用效果的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jan;86(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
Comparison of Tie Wing Fracture Resistance of Differing Ceramic Brackets.不同陶瓷托槽抗结扎翼折断性能的比较
Turk J Orthod. 2022 Dec;35(4):255-259. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21209.
6
New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties.新型美学内置 3D 打印托槽:概念验证和基本机械性能。
Prog Orthod. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00400-z.
7
Effects of self-ligating brackets and other factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes: A prospective cohort study.自锁托槽及其他影响正畸治疗效果的因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Nov 25;51(6):397-406. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.397.
8
The critical bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to dental glass-ceramics.正畸托槽与牙科玻璃陶瓷的临界粘结强度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Dec;23(12):4345-4353. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02881-5. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
9
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets.美学弓丝与陶瓷托槽组合时的偏转力比较。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170220. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0220. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Torque differences due to the material variation of the orthodontic appliance: a finite element study.正畸矫治器材料变化引起的转矩差异:有限元研究。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0161-5. Epub 2017 Feb 27.