• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[钢铁工人安全认知与安全行为与职业伤害关联的调查]

[Investigation on the association of safety perception and safety behaviors with occupational injuries in steel-workers].

作者信息

Shao Tao, Cao Duo-Zhi, Li Hui-Zhen, Kong Jian, Xia Zhao-Lin

机构信息

Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2004 Dec;22(6):416-8.

PMID:15748472
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association of occupational injuries, with their individual safety perception and safety behaviors in steel workers, so as to provide basis for preventing and controlling occupational injuries.

METHODS

Case-control design was used to compare the difference in safety perception and safety behaviors between the injury group and the control, and also to compare the difference in safety behaviors between different safety perception groups.

RESULTS

There were remarkable differences in attitude toward the safety degree of the work (chi(2) = 5.444, P < 0.05), and accidents happening (chi(2) = 4.552, P < 0.05) between case group and control group. There were remarkable difference in safety behaviors including manual operations instead of facilities (chi(2) = 10.015, P < 0.01), cleaning up, examining or adjusting machine during work (chi(2) = 7.351, P < 0.05), attention diversion (chi(2) = 10.937, P < 0.01) and unsafe wearing (chi(2) = 7.521, P < 0.05) between case group and control group. There were also significant differences in many safety behaviors between those who thought the job was safe or unsafe.

CONCLUSION

There is some association of occupational injuries with safety perception and safety behaviors. To reduce the occurrence of occupational injury, measures should been focused on strengthening safety management and controlling unsafe behaviors.

摘要

目的

探讨钢铁工人职业伤害与其个人安全认知及安全行为之间的关联,为职业伤害的预防与控制提供依据。

方法

采用病例对照设计,比较伤害组与对照组在安全认知和安全行为方面的差异,同时比较不同安全认知组之间的安全行为差异。

结果

病例组与对照组在对工作安全程度的态度(χ² = 5.444,P < 0.05)以及事故发生情况(χ² = 4.552,P < 0.05)方面存在显著差异。病例组与对照组在安全行为方面也存在显著差异,包括手动操作而非使用设备(χ² = 10.015,P < 0.01)、工作期间清理、检查或调整机器(χ² = 7.351,P < 0.05)、注意力分散(χ² = 10.937,P < 0.01)以及不安全着装(χ² = 7.521,P < 0.05)。认为工作安全或不安全的人群在许多安全行为方面也存在显著差异。

结论

职业伤害与安全认知及安全行为之间存在一定关联。为减少职业伤害的发生,应着重采取加强安全管理和控制不安全行为的措施。

相似文献

1
[Investigation on the association of safety perception and safety behaviors with occupational injuries in steel-workers].[钢铁工人安全认知与安全行为与职业伤害关联的调查]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2004 Dec;22(6):416-8.
2
[Associations of occupational safety atmosphere and behaviors with unintentional injuries].职业安全氛围及行为与意外伤害的关联
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Jul;30(7):488-92.
3
Effects of safety climate on safety norm violations: exploring the mediating role of attitudinal ambivalence toward personal protective equipment.安全氛围对安全规范违规的影响:探讨个人防护设备态度矛盾的中介作用。
J Safety Res. 2009;40(4):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
4
Behavioral and nonbehavioral risk factors for occupational injuries and health problems among Belgian farmers.比利时农民职业伤害和健康问题的行为和非行为风险因素。
J Agromedicine. 2011 Oct;16(4):299-310. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.605709.
5
A case-control study of eye injuries in the workplace in Hong Kong.香港工作场所眼部损伤的病例对照研究。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan;111(1):70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.018.
6
Case-control study on the prevention of occupational eye injuries.职业性眼外伤预防的病例对照研究
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Jan;24(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70067-6.
7
An epidemiological study of injury in mines: implications for safety promotion.一项关于矿山伤害的流行病学研究:对促进安全的启示
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2005 Sep;12(3):157-65. doi: 10.1080/15660970500088763.
8
Safety performance: the mediating role of safety control.安全绩效:安全控制的中介作用。
Work. 2011;40(1):99-111. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1210.
9
Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers.为什么工人在工作中会有不安全行为?产业工人安全工作行为的决定因素。
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Mar;61(3):239-46.
10
Determinants of accident proneness: a case-control study in railway workers.事故倾向性的决定因素:铁路工人的病例对照研究
Occup Med (Lond). 2006 May;56(3):187-90. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqj016. Epub 2006 Feb 1.