Suppr超能文献

为什么工人在工作中会有不安全行为?产业工人安全工作行为的决定因素。

Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers.

作者信息

Garcia A M, Boix P, Canosa C

机构信息

Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, University of Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2004 Mar;61(3):239-46.

Abstract

AIMS

To explore the relation between safety climate (workers' perceptions regarding management's attitudes towards occupational safety and health) and workers' behaviour at work.

METHODS

Cross sectional survey of workers at the pottery industry in Castellon, Spain. Sampling was stratified by plant size and workers' gender, according to data on the working population at this setting. A total of 734 production workers were interviewed. Information was collected on safety climate and workers' behaviour towards occupational risks with a specific questionnaire. A safety climate index (SCI, scale 0-100) was constructed adding scores for each item measuring safety climate in the questionnaire. Workers' unsafe behaviour was analysed for the different safety climate index levels.

RESULTS

Mean score for SCI was 71.90 (SD 19.19). There were no differences in SCI scores according to age, gender, education, children at charge, seniority at work, or type of employment. Small workplaces (<50 workers) showed significantly worse SCI (mean 67.23, SD 19.73) than the largest factories (>200 workers). Lower levels of SCI (SCI <50) were related to workers' unsafe behaviours (full/high accord with the statement "I excessively expose myself to hazards in my work", adjusted odds ratio ORa 2.79, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.88), and to lack of compliance with safety rules (ORa 12.83, 95% CI 5.92 to 27.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Safety climate measures workers' perception of organisational factors related to occupational health and safety (for example, management commitment to risk prevention or priorities of safety versus production). In this study these factors are strongly associated with workers' attitudes towards safety at work. Longitudinal studies can further clarify the relation between safety climate and workers' behaviour regarding occupational safety and health.

摘要

目的

探讨安全氛围(工人对管理层对职业安全与健康态度的认知)与工人工作行为之间的关系。

方法

对西班牙卡斯特利翁陶瓷行业的工人进行横断面调查。根据该行业劳动人口数据,按工厂规模和工人性别进行分层抽样。共采访了734名生产工人。通过一份特定问卷收集有关安全氛围和工人对职业风险行为的信息。构建了一个安全氛围指数(SCI,范围为0 - 100),通过对问卷中衡量安全氛围的每个项目得分相加得出。分析了不同安全氛围指数水平下工人的不安全行为。

结果

SCI的平均得分为71.90(标准差19.19)。根据年龄、性别、教育程度、抚养子女情况、工作年限或就业类型,SCI得分没有差异。小型工作场所(<50名工人)的SCI显著低于最大的工厂(>200名工人)(平均67.23,标准差19.73)。较低的SCI水平(SCI<50)与工人的不安全行为有关(完全/高度认同“我在工作中过度暴露于危险中”这一陈述,调整后的优势比ORa为2.79,95%置信区间为1.60至4.88),以及与不遵守安全规则有关(ORa为12.8,3,95%置信区间为5.92至27.80)。

结论

安全氛围衡量工人对与职业健康和安全相关的组织因素的认知(例如,管理层对风险预防的承诺或安全与生产的优先级)。在本研究中,这些因素与工人对工作安全的态度密切相关。纵向研究可以进一步阐明安全氛围与工人在职业安全与健康方面行为之间的关系。

相似文献

2
Hospital safety climate and its relationship with safe work practices and workplace exposure incidents.
Am J Infect Control. 2000 Jun;28(3):211-21. doi: 10.1067/mic.2000.105288.
4
Roles of safety climate and shift work on perceived injury risk: a multi-level analysis.
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Nov;39(6):1088-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
5
An exploration of Hispanic workers' perspectives about risks and hazards associated with orchard work.
Fam Community Health. 2009 Jan-Mar;32(1):34-47. doi: 10.1097/01.FCH.0000342815.49649.46.
7
The perceived compatibility of safety and production expectations in hazardous occupations.
J Safety Res. 2007;38(3):299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.10.011. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
8
EMS providers' perceptions of safety climate and adherence to safe work practices.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):53-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.621043.
9
Safety practices in construction industry.
J Occup Med. 1987 Nov;29(11):863-8.
10
Health and safety in clinical laboratory practice in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Afr J Med Med Sci. 1998 Sep-Dec;27(3-4):201-4.

引用本文的文献

2
Worker versus Employer Perspectives on Safety in the Forestry Services Industry.
J Agromedicine. 2023 Apr;28(2):224-229. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2022.2089422. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Occupational Health Hazards: Employer, Employee, and Labour Union Concerns.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 19;18(10):5423. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105423.
4
Determinants of Occupational Safety Culture in Hospitals and other Workplaces-Results from an Integrative Literature Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18):6588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186588.
9
Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005708. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Organizational interventions: facing the limits of the natural science paradigm.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Dec;25(6):589-96. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.485.
3
Testing the reliability and validity of a measure of safety climate.
J Healthc Qual. 2000 Mar-Apr;22(2):19-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2000.tb00111.x.
4
Hospital safety climate and its relationship with safe work practices and workplace exposure incidents.
Am J Infect Control. 2000 Jun;28(3):211-21. doi: 10.1067/mic.2000.105288.
5
Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety.
Accid Anal Prev. 1997 Sep;29(5):643-50. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00015-8.
6
Workplace organizational correlates of lost-time accident rates in manufacturing.
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Mar;29(3):258-68. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199603)29:3<258::AID-AJIM5>3.0.CO;2-M.
9
The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model.
Accid Anal Prev. 1986 Dec;18(6):455-70. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90019-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验