Jackson Cath, Lawton Rebecca, Knapp Peter, Raynor David K, Conner Mark, Lowe Catherine, Closs S José
School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.014. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
Increasing evidence suggests that implementation intentions are effective in moving people towards achieving health behaviour goals. However, the type of health behaviours for which they work best is unclear. Furthermore, implementation intentions appear to be less effective when studied in clinical rather than student populations. This prospective study tested implementation intentions with a complex, repeated health behaviour in a patient sample. A total of 120 cardiac patients in the UK were asked to increase their daily fruit and vegetable consumption by two portions and to maintain this over 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups (control, Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) questionnaire, TPB questionnaire+implementation intention) and telephoned at 7, 28 and 90 days follow-up to record daily consumption (24-h recall measure); 94 participants completed the study. Daily fruit and vegetable consumption increased from 2.88 portions (SD=1.67) at recruitment to 4.28 portions (SD=2.25) at 90 days. A 4x3 (time by group) mixed design ANCOVA was computed with daily fruit and vegetable consumption at recruitment entered as a covariate. This revealed a significant time effect (F (3, 270)=29.79, p<0.001) (eta2=0.25) but non-significant group (F (2, 90)=0.32, p=0.73) (eta2=0.07) and time by group effects (F (6, 270)=0.48, p=0.82) (eta2=0.01). There was also a significant main effect of the covariate (F (1, 90)=48.51, p<0.001) (eta2=0.35) and a significant time by covariate effect (F (3, 270)=12.14, p<0.001) (eta2=0.12). Substantial increases in fruit and vegetable consumption were achieved particularly by participants who were eating low levels at recruitment. Consumption was not improved by implementation intentions. These findings are discussed in the context of the targeted health behaviour and sample.
越来越多的证据表明,执行意图在促使人们实现健康行为目标方面是有效的。然而,它们最有效的健康行为类型尚不清楚。此外,在临床人群而非学生人群中进行研究时,执行意图似乎效果较差。这项前瞻性研究在患者样本中测试了针对复杂的、重复的健康行为的执行意图。英国共有120名心脏病患者被要求将每日水果和蔬菜的摄入量增加两份,并在3个月内保持这一摄入量。参与者被随机分为三组(对照组、计划行为理论(TPB)问卷组、TPB问卷 + 执行意图组),并在随访的第7天、28天和90天进行电话随访,以记录每日摄入量(24小时回忆法);94名参与者完成了研究。每日水果和蔬菜的摄入量从招募时的2.88份(标准差 = 1.67)增加到90天时的4.28份(标准差 = 2.25)。以招募时的每日水果和蔬菜摄入量作为协变量,计算了一个4×3(时间×组)混合设计的协方差分析。这显示出显著的时间效应(F(3, 270) = 29.79,p < 0.001)(偏 eta 方 = 0.25),但组效应不显著(F(2, 90) = 0.32,p = 0.73)(偏 eta 方 = 0.07),时间×组效应也不显著(F(6, 270) = 0.48,p = 0.82)(偏 eta 方 = 0.01)。协变量也有显著的主效应(F(1, 90) = 48.51,p < 0.001)(偏 eta 方 = 0.35)以及显著的时间×协变量效应(F(3, 270) = 12.14,p < 0.001)(偏 eta 方 = 0.12)。尤其是在招募时摄入量较低的参与者,水果和蔬菜的摄入量有大幅增加。执行意图并未改善摄入量。将结合目标健康行为和样本对这些发现进行讨论。