• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[修订后的神经行为评定量表:同时效度评估]

[The neurobehavioral rating scale-revised: assessment of concurrent validity].

作者信息

Soury S, Mazaux J M, Lambert J, De Seze M, Joseph P A, Lozes-Boudillon S, McCauley S, Vanier M, Levin H S

机构信息

Unité UEROS, service MP réadaptation, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Mar;48(2):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.08.007. Epub 2005 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.08.007
PMID:15748770
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Cognitive and behavioral impairment are a major source of disability in daily living of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS-R) is a short, easy-to administer interview tool developed to improve assessment by clinicians. Data are available on its criterion validity and reliability, but the concurrent validity of the French NRS-R was not yet documented.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the concurrent validity of the NRS-R with current psychometric tests.

METHOD

One hundred and four patients with TBI enrolled in a community adjustment program underwent concurrent examination with the NRS-R, cognitive tests assessing memory, attention, and executive functions, and scales of anxiety (STAI) and depressive mood (CES-D). Intercorrelations were undertaken between these variables and the five factors of the NRS-R: F1, intentional behavior; F2, lowered emotional state; F3, survival-oriented behaviour/hightened emotional state; F4, arousal state; and F5, language. Patients were 82 men and 22 women, the mean age was 28.5 years, and 70% had severe TBI (Glasgow coma score [GCS] below 8 on admission). They were assessed 52 months on average after their injury.

RESULTS

Factor F1 was correlated with results on the GCS (P<0.05), the Tower of London test (TL, P<0.01), the Trail Making Test (TMT, P<0.01), divided attention (DA) and inhibition (IN) subscales of the Zimmermann and Fimm's Attention battery (TEA) (P<0.01) and reverse digit span (DS, P<0.05). Factor F2 was positively related to age at injury, time since injury (TSI) (P<0.05) and CESD and STAI scores (P<0.001). Factor F3 was related to DA (P<0.01) TL scores and TSI (P<0.05). Factor F4 was related to TL, TMT, DA, flexibility, DS (P<0.05), TSI, duration of post-traumatic amnesia, CES-D score (P<0.05) and STAI scores (P<0.01). Factor F5 was related to GCS, DA (P<0.05), and reaction time on the subscales IN and Go/nogo (GO) of the TEA battery (P<0.01). The NRS-R total score was related to CESD, STAI scores, TMT score, DA (P<0.01) and TL score, IN and GO scores and TSI (P<0.05).

DISCUSSION

As McCauley et al found with the English version of the NRS-R, significant relationships were found between NRS-R factor scores, cognitive tests and emotional scales. Relationships were also found between factor scores and indicators of injury severity and time since injury. These data suggest fair concurrent validity of the NRS-R.

摘要

未标注

认知和行为障碍是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者日常生活中致残的主要原因。修订后的神经行为评定量表(NRS-R)是一种简短、易于实施的访谈工具,旨在改善临床医生的评估。已有关于其标准效度和信度的数据,但法国版NRS-R的同时效度尚未得到记录。

目的

评估NRS-R与当前心理测量测试的同时效度。

方法

104名参加社区适应项目的TBI患者同时接受了NRS-R、评估记忆、注意力和执行功能的认知测试以及焦虑量表(STAI)和抑郁情绪量表(CES-D)的检查。对这些变量与NRS-R的五个因子进行了相互关联分析:F1,故意行为;F2,情绪状态降低;F3,生存导向行为/情绪状态增强;F4,觉醒状态;F5,语言。患者中男性82名,女性22名,平均年龄28.5岁,70%有重度TBI(入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分[GCS]低于8分)。他们在受伤后平均52个月接受评估。

结果

因子F1与GCS结果(P<0.05)、伦敦塔测试(TL,P<0.01)、连线测验(TMT,P<0.01)、齐默尔曼和菲姆注意力测验(TEA)的分散注意力(DA)和抑制(IN)子量表(P<0.01)以及倒背数字广度(DS,P<0.05)相关。因子F2与受伤年龄、受伤后时间(TSI)(P<0.05)以及CESD和STAI评分(P<0.001)呈正相关。因子F3与DA(P<0.01)、TL评分和TSI(P<0.05)相关。因子F4与TL、TMT、DA、灵活性、DS(P<0.05)、TSI、创伤后遗忘持续时间、CES-D评分(P<0.05)和STAI评分(P<0.01)相关。因子F5与GCS、DA(P<0.05)以及TEA测验IN和Go/NoGo(GO)子量表上的反应时间(P<0.01)相关。NRS-R总分与CESD、STAI评分、TMT评分、DA(P<0.01)以及TL评分、IN和GO评分以及TSI(P<0.05)相关。

讨论

正如麦考利等人对英文版NRS-R的研究结果,NRS-R因子评分、认知测试和情绪量表之间存在显著关系。因子评分与损伤严重程度指标和受伤后时间之间也存在关系。这些数据表明NRS-R具有一定的同时效度。

相似文献

1
[The neurobehavioral rating scale-revised: assessment of concurrent validity].[修订后的神经行为评定量表:同时效度评估]
Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Mar;48(2):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.08.007. Epub 2005 Jan 15.
2
The role of injury severity in neurobehavioral outcome 3 months after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤3个月后损伤严重程度在神经行为结果中的作用。
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2002 Jun;15(2):123-32.
3
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
4
The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.用于创伤性脑损伤的莫斯注意力评定量表:对信度和变化敏感性的进一步探索。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):966-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.031.
5
Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.评估用于社区个体长期随访的创伤性脑损伤结局指标。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):367-74. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.21525.
6
Chronic hypopituitarism after traumatic brain injury: risk assessment and relationship to outcome.创伤性脑损伤后的慢性垂体功能减退:风险评估及其与预后的关系。
Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5):1080-93; discussion 1093-4. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325870.60129.6a.
7
The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury.简短住院神经心理成套测验对创伤性脑损伤患者的预测效度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):950-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.011.
8
Mood and neuropsychological changes in women with midlife depression treated with escitalopram.艾司西酞普兰治疗中年抑郁症女性的情绪和神经心理变化。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;26(4):361-6. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000227699.26375.f8.
9
Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised.头部损伤后神经心理学障碍的评估:修订版神经行为评定量表的评分者间信度、因子效度和效标效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jun;81(6):796-806. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90114-x.
10
Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.与格拉斯哥昏迷量表相比,简明损伤评分和损伤严重程度评分在预测创伤性脑损伤后结局方面的效用。
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):946-50. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000229796.14717.3a.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-rater agreement of the Turkish version of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised form.《神经行为评定量表修订版》土耳其语版本的评分者间信度。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug 29;63(2):133-142. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2017.207. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Levels of state and trait anxiety in patients referred to ophthalmology by primary care clinicians: a cross sectional study.初级保健临床医生转诊至眼科的患者的状态和特质焦虑水平:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e65708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065708. Print 2013.
3
Neurological outcome scale for traumatic brain injury: III. Criterion-related validity and sensitivity to change in the NABIS hypothermia-II clinical trial.
创伤性脑损伤的神经学结果量表:III. 在 NABIS 低温 II 临床试验中的准则相关有效性和对变化的敏感性。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Sep 1;30(17):1506-11. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2925. Epub 2013 Aug 2.