Heller Ryan C, Marians Kenneth J
Program in Molecular Biology, Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Mol Cell. 2005 Mar 4;17(5):733-43. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.01.019.
Rescue of arrested and collapsed replication forks is essential for maintenance of genomic integrity. One system for origin of replication-independent loading of the DnaB replicative helicase and subsequent replisome reassembly requires the structure-specific recognition factor PriA and the assembly factors PriB and DnaT. Here, we provide biochemical evidence for an alternate system for DnaB loading that requires only PriC. Furthermore, the choice of which system is utilized during restart is dictated by the nature of the structure of the stalled replication fork. PriA-dependent reactions are most robust on fork structures with no gaps in the leading strand, such as is found at the junction of a D loop, while the PriC-dependent system preferentially utilizes fork structures with large gaps in the leading strand. These observations suggest that the type of initial damage on the DNA template and how the inactivated fork is processed ultimately influence the choice of enzymatic restart pathway.
挽救停滞和崩溃的复制叉对于维持基因组完整性至关重要。一种用于在不依赖复制起点的情况下加载DnaB复制解旋酶并随后重新组装复制体的系统需要结构特异性识别因子PriA以及组装因子PriB和DnaT。在这里,我们提供了仅需PriC的另一种DnaB加载系统的生化证据。此外,在复制重新启动过程中使用哪种系统的选择取决于停滞复制叉结构的性质。PriA依赖性反应在领头链无间隙的叉状结构上最为强劲,例如在D环的连接处发现的那样,而PriC依赖性系统优先利用领头链有大间隙的叉状结构。这些观察结果表明,DNA模板上初始损伤的类型以及失活叉的处理方式最终会影响酶促重新启动途径的选择。