Suppr超能文献

测量土地施用粪肥的氨排放:常用采样器和技术的相互比较

Measuring ammonia emissions from land applied manure: an intercomparison of commonly used samplers and techniques.

作者信息

Misselbrook T H, Nicholson F A, Chambers B J, Johnson R A

机构信息

Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2005 Jun;135(3):389-97. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.11.012.

Abstract

A number of techniques have been developed to quantify ammonia (NH(3)) emissions following land application of manure or fertiliser. In this study, coefficients of variation were determined for three commonly used field techniques (mass balance integrated horizontal flux, wind tunnels and the equilibrium concentration technique) for measuring emissions from a range of manure types. Coefficients of variation (CV) for absorption flasks, passive flux samplers and passive diffusion samplers were 21, 10 and 14%, respectively. In comparative measurements, concentrations measured using passive flux samplers and absorption flasks did not differ significantly, but those measured using passive diffusion samplers were on average 1.8 times greater. The mass balance technique and wind tunnels gave broadly similar results in two out of four field tests. Overexposure of passive diffusion samplers for some sampling periods meant that estimation of cumulative NH(3) emission using the equilibrium concentration technique in the field tests could not be made. For cumulative NH(3) emissions, CVs were in the range of 23-52, 46-74 and 21-39% for the mass balance, wind tunnel and equilibrium concentration techniques, respectively. Lower CVs were associated with measurements following slurry compared with solid manure applications. Our conclusions from this study are that for the measurement of absolute emissions the mass balance technique is to be preferred, and for small-plot comparative measurements the wind tunnel system is preferred to the equilibrium concentration technique.

摘要

人们已经开发出多种技术来量化在土地上施用粪肥或化肥后氨(NH₃)的排放量。在本研究中,测定了三种常用田间技术(质量平衡综合水平通量法、风洞法和平衡浓度法)针对一系列粪肥类型测量排放的变异系数。吸收瓶、被动通量采样器和被动扩散采样器的变异系数(CV)分别为21%、10%和14%。在对比测量中,使用被动通量采样器和吸收瓶测得的浓度没有显著差异,但使用被动扩散采样器测得的浓度平均高出1.8倍。在四项田间试验中的两项试验里,质量平衡法和风洞法得出的结果大致相似。在某些采样期间被动扩散采样器过度暴露,这意味着无法在田间试验中使用平衡浓度法估算NH₃的累积排放量。对于NH₃的累积排放量,质量平衡法、风洞法和平衡浓度法的变异系数分别在23 - 52%、46 - 74%和21 - 39%的范围内。与施用固体粪肥相比,施用 slurry(此处原文可能有误,推测为“slurry manure”即 slurry 粪肥)后的测量结果变异系数较低。我们从本研究得出的结论是,对于绝对排放量的测量,质量平衡法更可取;对于小地块对比测量,风洞系统比平衡浓度法更可取。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验