Radtka Sandra A, Skinner Stephen R, Johanson M Elise
Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, University of California at San Francisco/San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Gait Posture. 2005 Apr;21(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.03.004.
This study compared the effects of solid and hinged ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on the gait of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) who ambulate with excessive ankle plantar flexion during stance. Twelve children with spastic diplegic CP wore no AFOs for an initial 2-week period, solid AFOs for 1 month, no AFOs for 2 weeks, and hinged AFOs for 1 month. Lower extremity muscle timing, knee and ankle joint motions, moments and powers, and temporal-distance characteristics were measured during ambulation for an initial barefoot baseline test, and with solid and hinged AFOs for the other two tests. Both orthoses increased stride length, reduced abnormal ankle plantar flexion during initial contact, midstance and terminal stance (TST), and increased ankle plantar flexor moments closer to normal during TST. Hinged AFOs increased ankle dorsiflexion at TST and increased ankle power generation during preswing (PSW) as compared to solid AFOs, and increased ankle dorsiflexion at loading compared to no AFOs. No other significant differences were found for the gait variables when comparing these orthoses. Either AFO could be used to reduce the excessive ankle plantar flexion without affecting the knee position during stance. The hinged AFO would be recommended to produce more normal dorsiflexion during TST and increased ankle power generation during PSW in children with spastic diplegic CP.
本研究比较了固体踝足矫形器(AFO)和铰链式踝足矫形器对痉挛型双侧瘫脑瘫(CP)儿童步态的影响,这些儿童在站立期存在过度的踝关节跖屈。12名痉挛型双侧瘫脑瘫儿童最初2周不佩戴AFO,接着佩戴固体AFO 1个月,然后2周不佩戴AFO,最后佩戴铰链式AFO 1个月。在步行过程中,针对最初的赤足基线测试以及佩戴固体和铰链式AFO的另外两次测试,测量下肢肌肉时机、膝关节和踝关节运动、力矩和功率以及时间-距离特征。两种矫形器均增加了步幅,减少了初始接触、支撑中期和支撑末期(TST)时异常的踝关节跖屈,并使TST期间踝关节跖屈肌力矩更接近正常。与固体AFO相比,铰链式AFO在TST时增加了踝关节背屈,并在摆动前期(PSW)增加了踝关节功率产生,与不佩戴AFO相比,在负重时增加了踝关节背屈。比较这些矫形器时,未发现步态变量有其他显著差异。两种AFO均可用于减少过度的踝关节跖屈,而不影响站立期的膝关节位置。对于痉挛型双侧瘫脑瘫儿童,建议使用铰链式AFO在TST时产生更正常的背屈,并在PSW期间增加踝关节功率产生。