Suppr超能文献

头部创伤后接受抗凝治疗患者的CT检查指征。

Indications for CT in patients receiving anticoagulation after head trauma.

作者信息

Gittleman Adam M, Ortiz A Orlando, Keating David P, Katz Douglas S

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY 11501, USA.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Mar;26(3):603-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Head CT is frequently ordered for trauma patients who are receiving anticoagulation. However, whether patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 and normal findings on neurologic examination require CT is still debated. The purpose of our study was to assess the use of cranial CT in patients receiving anticoagulants after head trauma and to establish clinical criteria to identify those in this group who do not need emergency CT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving heparin or coumadin who had head trauma and who subsequently underwent cranial CT at a level I trauma center within a 4-year period. Patients were evaluated for mechanism of injury, clinical signs and symptoms of head injury, and type and reason for anticoagulation. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, GCS score, age, and head CT results were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients fulfilled the enrollment criteria. Among them, 82 had no evidence of intracranial injury on CT. Seven patients had evidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Patients without hemorrhage had no significant focal neurologic deficits and presented with an average GCS score of 14.8. Patients with intracranial hemorrhage tended to have focal neurologic deficits and presented with an average GCS score of 12.0.

CONCLUSION

Patients with head injury, normal GCS scores, and no focal neurologic deficits and who are receiving the anticoagulants heparin or coumadin may not necessarily require emergency CT.

摘要

背景与目的

对于正在接受抗凝治疗的创伤患者,经常会安排头部CT检查。然而,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为15分且神经系统检查结果正常的患者是否需要进行CT检查仍存在争议。我们研究的目的是评估头部外伤后接受抗凝治疗的患者使用头颅CT的情况,并建立临床标准以识别该组中不需要紧急CT检查的患者。

方法

我们回顾性分析了在4年期间内于一级创伤中心接受肝素或华法林治疗且头部外伤后接受头颅CT检查的患者。对患者的受伤机制、头部损伤的临床体征和症状以及抗凝的类型和原因进行了评估。记录每位患者的凝血酶原时间、国际标准化比值、部分凝血活酶时间、GCS评分、年龄和头部CT结果。

结果

共有89例患者符合纳入标准。其中,82例CT检查无颅内损伤证据。7例有颅内出血证据。无出血的患者无明显局灶性神经功能缺损,平均GCS评分为14.8分。颅内出血患者往往有局灶性神经功能缺损,平均GCS评分为12.0分。

结论

头部受伤、GCS评分正常、无局灶性神经功能缺损且正在接受肝素或华法林抗凝治疗的患者不一定需要紧急CT检查。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
The epidemic of pre-injury oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant use.受伤前口服抗血小板药物和抗凝药物的流行情况。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Dec;40(6):657-69. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0404-9. Epub 2014 May 1.
7
Impact of age on the clinical outcomes of major trauma.年龄对重大创伤临床结局的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Jun;42(3):317-32. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0557-1. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Minor head trauma in anticoagulated patients.
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Feb;6(2):121-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01048.x.
3
The utility of head computed tomography after minimal head injury.
J Trauma. 1999 Feb;46(2):268-70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199902000-00012.
9
Are CT scans for head injury patients always necessary?头部受伤患者都需要进行CT扫描吗?
J Trauma. 1991 Jun;31(6):801-4; discussion 804-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199106000-00010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验