Romagnuolo Joseph, Flemons W W, Perkins Linda, Lutz Linda, Jamieson Peter C, Hiscock Carrie A, Foley Lynda, Meddings Jon B
Department of Medicine (Divisions of Department of Medicine (Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Jun;17(3):249-54. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi023. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
To examine the effect of improved gastroenterologist-to-admitting service communication on hospital stay for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
a detailed checklist addressing factors relevant to discharge planning would shorten hospital stay, when added to the procedure report.
Pre-post intervention design, recording balance measures (potential confounders).
A Canadian university hospital.
Intermittent 5- to 7-day batches of consecutive emergency patients presenting with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding as their primary problem. The durations of the background and intervention periods were 3 months (beginning 9 June 2003) and 4 weeks (beginning 8 September 2003), respectively.
The gastrointestinal bleeding Quality Improvement and Health Information multidisciplinary team (quality improvement personnel; emergency physicians, hospitalists, gastroenterologists, in-patient and endoscopy nurses) developed a one-page checklist, outlining detailed recommendations (3-Ds-diet, drugs, discharge plan) to append to the procedure report.
Difference in median length of hospital stay was the primary endpoint. As balance measures, demographics, bleeding severity, comorbidities, readmission rates, and various benchmark times were recorded prospectively.
Thirty-nine patients met the criteria in the background period (4 months, intermittently sampled), and 22 in the intervention period (4 weeks, continuously sampled). There were no significant baseline differences. Median in-patient stay was 7.0 (95% interquartile range 2-24) versus 3.5 (95% interquartile range 1-12) days for the background and intervention periods, respectively (P = 0.003). This remained significant when outliers (stay > 10 days) were removed (P = 0.02).
A checklist, with very specific recommendations to the admitting service, significantly reduced hospital stay for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding.
探讨改善胃肠病医生与住院服务沟通对非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者住院时间的影响。
在手术报告中增加一份针对出院计划相关因素的详细检查表,可缩短住院时间。
干预前后设计,记录平衡指标(潜在混杂因素)。
加拿大一所大学医院。
以非静脉曲张性上消化道出血为主要问题的间歇性5至7天连续急诊患者批次。背景期和干预期时长分别为3个月(始于2003年6月9日)和4周(始于2003年9月8日)。
胃肠出血质量改进与健康信息多学科团队(质量改进人员、急诊医生、住院医生、胃肠病医生、住院部和内镜护士)制定了一份一页的检查表,列出详细建议(3-Ds——饮食、药物、出院计划),附在手术报告后。
住院时间中位数的差异是主要终点。作为平衡指标,前瞻性记录人口统计学特征、出血严重程度、合并症、再入院率和各种基准时间。
背景期(4个月,间歇性抽样)有39例患者符合标准,干预期(4周,连续抽样)有22例。基线无显著差异。背景期和干预期的住院时间中位数分别为7.0天(95%四分位间距2 - 24)和3.5天(95%四分位间距1 - 12)(P = 0.003)。去除异常值(住院时间>10天)后,差异仍显著(P = 0.02)。
一份向住院服务提供非常具体建议的检查表,显著缩短了非静脉曲张性胃肠出血患者的住院时间。