Suppr超能文献

系统评价医疗保健团队在急性医院环境中使用安全检查表的效果——有效性的证据有限。

Systematic review of safety checklists for use by medical care teams in acute hospital settings--limited evidence of effectiveness.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Southern Health, Locked Bag 29, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 2;11:211. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-211.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient safety is a fundamental component of good quality health care. Checklists have been proposed as a method of improving patient safety. This systematic review, asked "In acute hospital settings, would the use of safety checklists applied by medical care teams, compared to not using checklists, improve patient safety?"

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE for randomised controlled trials published in English before September 2009. Studies were selected and appraised by two reviewers independently in consultation with colleagues, using inclusion, exclusion and appraisal criteria established a priori.

RESULTS

Nine cohort studies with historical controls studies from four hospital care settings were included-intensive care unit, emergency department, surgery, and acute care. The studies used a variety of designs of safety checklists, and implemented them in different ways, however most incorporated an educational component to teach the staff how to use the checklist. The studies assessed outcomes occurring a few weeks to a maximum of 12 months post-implementation, and these outcomes were diverse.The studies were generally of low to moderate quality and of low levels of evidence, with all but one of the studies containing a high risk of bias.The results of these studies suggest some improvements in patient safety arising from use of safety checklists, but these were not consistent across all studies or for all outcomes. Some studies showed no difference in outcomes between checklist use and standard care without a checklist. Due to the variations in setting, checklist design, educational training given, and outcomes measured, it was unfeasible to accurately summarise any trends across all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The included studies suggest some benefits of using safety checklists to improve protocol adherence and patient safety, but due to the risk of bias in these studies, their results should be interpreted with caution. More high quality and studies, are needed to enable confident conclusions about the effectiveness of safety checklists in acute hospital settings.

摘要

背景

患者安全是高质量医疗保健的基本组成部分。清单被提议作为提高患者安全性的一种方法。本次系统评价的问题是“在急性医院环境中,与不使用清单相比,医疗保健团队使用安全清单是否会提高患者安全性?”

方法

我们在 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 EMBASE 中搜索了 2009 年 9 月前发表的英文随机对照试验。研究由两名评审员独立进行选择和评估,并与同事协商,使用事先确定的纳入、排除和评估标准。

结果

共有 9 项来自 4 个医院护理环境(重症监护室、急诊室、外科和急性护理)的队列研究包含历史对照研究。这些研究使用了各种设计的安全清单,并以不同的方式实施,但大多数都包含一个教育组成部分,以教导员工如何使用清单。研究评估了实施后几周至最长 12 个月内发生的结果,这些结果多种多样。这些研究的质量普遍较低,证据水平较低,除了一项研究外,其余研究都存在高偏倚风险。这些研究的结果表明,使用安全清单可在一定程度上提高患者安全性,但并非所有研究或所有结果都如此。一些研究表明,在使用清单和没有清单的标准护理之间,在结果上没有差异。由于设置、清单设计、教育培训和测量结果的变化,不可能准确地总结所有研究中的任何趋势。

结论

纳入的研究表明,使用安全清单可提高协议依从性和患者安全性,但由于这些研究存在偏倚风险,其结果应谨慎解释。需要更多高质量的研究,才能对安全清单在急性医院环境中的有效性做出有信心的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b52/3176176/92b813fe6f62/1472-6963-11-211-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验