Choy E H, Kingsley G H, Khoshaba B, Pipitone N, Scott D L
Department of Rheumatology, GKT School of Medicine, Weston Education Centre, Kings College, 10 Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Sep;64(9):1288-93. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030908. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), intramuscular (IM) pulsed depomedrone expedites an immediate response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although IM depomedrone is also widely used to treat disease flares in patients treated with DMARDs, its effect on radiological progression has not been assessed.
To evaluate the benefits of 120 mg IM depomedrone versus placebo in patients with established RA whose disease was inadequately controlled by existing DMARDs.
In a 2 year prospective randomised controlled trial patients were assessed using the ILAR/WHO core dataset, disease activity score (DAS28), x ray examination of hands and feet scored by Larsen's method, and bone densitometry.
291 patients with RA were screened, 166 were eligible, and 91 consented and were randomised. Disease activity improved more rapidly in the steroid treated patients than with placebo, but after 6 months no difference remained. A small but significant reduction in erosive damage in the steroid group compared with placebo was also found. More adverse reactions occurred in the steroid treated group than in the placebo patients (55 v 42), especially those reactions traditionally related to steroids (16 v 2), including vertebral fracture, diabetes, and myocardial infarction. Hip bone density fell significantly in steroid treated but not placebo patients.
IM depomedrone improved disease activity in the short term and produced a small reduction in bone erosion at the cost of a significant increase in adverse events. Despite the initial benefit of IM depomedrone, when patients respond suboptimally to a DMARD they should not be given long term additional steroids but should be treated with alternative or additional DMARDs.
在类风湿关节炎(RA)中,肌肉注射(IM)脉冲式地塞米松可加快对改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)的即时反应。虽然IM地塞米松也广泛用于治疗接受DMARDs治疗患者的疾病发作,但其对放射学进展的影响尚未评估。
评估120mg IM地塞米松与安慰剂相比,对疾病未被现有DMARDs充分控制的确诊RA患者的益处。
在一项为期2年的前瞻性随机对照试验中,使用国际风湿病联盟/世界卫生组织核心数据集、疾病活动评分(DAS28)、用Larsen方法对手和脚进行的X线检查以及骨密度测定对患者进行评估。
筛查了291例RA患者,166例符合条件,91例同意并被随机分组。接受类固醇治疗的患者疾病活动改善比接受安慰剂的患者更快,但6个月后差异不再存在。与安慰剂相比,类固醇组的侵蚀性损伤也有小幅但显著的减少。类固醇治疗组比安慰剂组发生更多的不良反应(55例对42例),尤其是那些传统上与类固醇相关的反应(16例对2例),包括椎体骨折、糖尿病和心肌梗死。接受类固醇治疗的患者髋部骨密度显著下降,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者则未下降。
IM地塞米松在短期内改善了疾病活动,并使骨侵蚀略有减少,但代价是不良事件显著增加。尽管IM地塞米松有初始益处,但当患者对DMARDs反应欠佳时,不应长期额外给予类固醇,而应使用替代或额外的DMARDs进行治疗。