Suppr超能文献

基于检索表现对精神病样本中不同失忆型和执行型记忆缺陷的验证。

Validation of distinct amnesic and executive type memory deficit in a psychiatric sample based on retrieval performance.

作者信息

Egeland Jens, Landrø Nils Inge, Sundet Kjetil, Asbjørnsen Arve, Lund Anders, Roness Atle, Rund Bjørn Rishovd

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2005 Apr;46(2):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00449.x.

Abstract

Studies of localized brain dysfunctions have revealed connections between patterns of cognitive dysfunction and specific profiles of memory impairment. The amnesic type of memory impairment is defined by deficits in both free recall and recognition memory, whereas the dysexecutive memory impairment is characterized by retrieval deficits, i.e. a disproportional impairment in free recall relative to recognition memory. The present study tests whether classifications of psychiatric patients into recall impaired only (= RO group) and Recall and Recognition impaired (= RR group) correspond to the executive type and amnesic type of memory impairment. The alternative hypothesis is that the two groups merely differ in degree of neuropsychological and psychiatric disturbance. Forty-four subjects impaired on California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) were selected from a larger database of 103 impaired and non-impaired subjects with schizophrenia or recurrent major depression. Subjects were classified into RO and RR groups and compared on measures of memory strategy (recency effect and interference on CVLT), overall neuropsychological function (Stroop Test and WAIS-R similarity) and psychiatric symptom load (positive and negative symptoms). Repeated measures ANOVA showed no effects of group, i.e. the RR group did not perform consistently below the RO group with regard to memory strategy, neuropsychological function or psychiatric symptom load. Two out of three analyses showed group x test interaction, supporting the dissociation of distinct executive and amnesic profiles among psychiatric patients. The RO group was more susceptible to interference but had better recency score than the RR group. The RO had higher negative symptoms while the RR group had higher positive symptoms.

摘要

对局部脑功能障碍的研究揭示了认知功能障碍模式与特定记忆损害特征之间的联系。遗忘型记忆损害的定义是自由回忆和识别记忆均存在缺陷,而执行功能障碍型记忆损害的特征是提取缺陷,即相对于识别记忆,自由回忆存在不成比例的损害。本研究测试了将精神科患者分为仅回忆受损组(=RO组)和回忆与识别均受损组(=RR组)是否与执行功能型和遗忘型记忆损害相对应。另一种假设是,两组仅在神经心理学和精神障碍程度上有所不同。从一个包含103名患有精神分裂症或复发性重度抑郁症的受损和未受损受试者的更大数据库中,选取了44名在加利福尼亚言语学习测试(CVLT)中受损的受试者。将受试者分为RO组和RR组,并在记忆策略(近期效应和CVLT上的干扰)、整体神经心理学功能(斯特鲁普测试和韦氏成人智力量表修订版相似性)和精神症状负荷(阳性和阴性症状)等指标上进行比较。重复测量方差分析显示组间无效应,即RR组在记忆策略、神经心理学功能或精神症状负荷方面并不始终低于RO组。三项分析中有两项显示组×测试交互作用,支持了精神科患者中不同执行功能和遗忘特征的分离。RO组比RR组更容易受到干扰,但近期得分更好。RO组有更高的阴性症状,而RR组有更高的阳性症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验