Miller Anton R, Johnston Charlotte, Klassen Anne F, Fine Stuart, Papsdorf Michael
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada.
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Mar 11;6(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-12.
Little is known about general and family practitioners' (GP/FPs') involvement and confidence in dealing with children with common psychosocial problems and mental health conditions. The aims of this study were to ascertain GP/FPs' preferred level of involvement with, and perceived comfort and skill in dealing with children with behavioral problems, social-emotional difficulties, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and mood disorders; and to identify factors associated with GP/FPs' involvement, comfort and skill.
Postal survey of a representative sample of 801 GP/FPs in British Columbia, Canada, which enquired about level of involvement (from primarily refer out to deal with case oneself); ratings of comfort/skill with assessment/diagnosis and management; beliefs regarding psychosocial problems in children; basic demographics; and practice information.
Surveys were completed by 405 of 629 eligible GP/FPs (64.4%). Over 80% of respondents reported collaborative arrangements with specialists across problem and condition types, although for children with behavior problems or ADHD, more physicians primarily refer (chi2 (1) = 9.0; P < 0.005; and chi2 (1) = 103.9; P < 0.001, respectively). Comfort/skill levels (mean +/- s.d) were higher for mood disorders (4.4 +/- 1.3) than behavior problems (3.6 +/- 1.1; F [3, 1155] = 84.0, P < .0001; effect size = 0.67), but not different from social-emotional difficulties (3.8 +/- 1.1) or ADHD (3.9 +/- 1.3). Taking primary responsibility for a case was consistently related to self-reported comfort/skill with each condition type (34% to 61% of variance across condition types), while comfort/skill ratings for each condition were related to exposure to relevant continuing medical education (all P < or = 0.001), and beliefs that these problems are significant and that GP/FPs have a role to play in dealing with them (P values ranged from 0.01 to < 0.001).
Supporting GP/FPs in their care for children with common psychosocial and mental health problems should include efforts to bolster their confidence and modify attitudes in relation towards these problems, especially behavior problems and ADHD, possibly within innovative continuing education programs.
对于普通科和家庭医生(GP/FPs)在处理患有常见心理社会问题和精神健康状况的儿童方面的参与程度和信心,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是确定GP/FPs在处理有行为问题、社会情感困难、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和情绪障碍的儿童时,倾向的参与程度,以及感知到的舒适度和技能水平;并识别与GP/FPs的参与、舒适度和技能相关的因素。
对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省801名GP/FPs的代表性样本进行邮寄调查,询问参与程度(从主要转诊到自己处理病例);对评估/诊断和管理的舒适度/技能评分;对儿童心理社会问题的看法;基本人口统计学信息;以及执业信息。
629名符合条件的GP/FPs中有405名(64.4%)完成了调查。超过80%的受访者报告了与各问题和病症类型的专家的合作安排,尽管对于有行为问题或ADHD的儿童,更多医生主要选择转诊(分别为χ2(1)=9.0;P<0.005;以及χ2(1)=103.9;P<0.001)。情绪障碍的舒适度/技能水平(均值±标准差)(4.4±1.3)高于行为问题(3.6±1.1;F[3,1155]=84.0,P<.0001;效应量=0.67),但与社会情感困难(3.8±1.1)或ADHD(3.9±1.3)无差异。对病例承担主要责任与每种病症类型的自我报告舒适度/技能始终相关(各病症类型方差的34%至61%),而每种病症的舒适度/技能评分与接受相关继续医学教育有关(所有P≤0.001),以及与认为这些问题很重要且GP/FPs在处理这些问题中可发挥作用的看法有关(P值范围从0.01至<0.001)。
在支持GP/FPs照顾患有常见心理社会和精神健康问题的儿童方面,应努力增强他们对这些问题的信心并改变态度,尤其是对行为问题和ADHD,可能需要通过创新的继续医学教育项目来实现。