Suppr超能文献

一项关于加拿大城市家庭医生提供小型门诊手术情况的横断面调查。

A cross sectional survey of urban Canadian family physicians' provision of minor office procedures.

作者信息

Sempowski Ian P, Rungi Arne A, Seguin Rachelle

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Mar 19;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A discordance exists between the proportion of Canadian family physicians that we expect should be able to perform minor office procedures and the actual provision of care. This pattern has not been extensively studied. The objective of this study was to determine the current patterns and obstacles relating to the provision of four minor office procedures by GP/FPs in a small city in Ontario, Canada. An additional goal was to determine the impact of the remuneration method on the provision of such services.

METHODS

A survey was mailed to all GP/FPs practising in Kingston, Ontario. The main outcomes measured in the study were work setting and remuneration method, current procedural practices with respect to four procedures, reasons for not performing procedures, current skill levels, and desire to upgrade.

RESULTS

Surveys were mailed to all 108 GP/FPs in the City of Kingston. Completed surveys were collected for 82 percent (89/108) and 10 were excluded leaving 79 eligible participants. The percentages of GP/FPs who reported performing the procedure were as follows: dermatological excision (63.3%), endometrial biopsy (35.4%), shoulder injection (31.6%), and knee injection (43.0%). The majority of GP/FPs who would not do the procedure themselves would refer to a specialist colleague rather than to another GP/FP. The top reason cited for not performing a specific procedure was "lack of up to date skills" followed by "lack of time". The latter was the only statistically significant difference reported between GP/FPs working in Family Health Networks and GP/FPs working in fee for service settings (26.7% vs 47.0%, chi2 = 4.191 p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

A large number of Kingston, Ontario GP/FPs refer patients who require one of four minor office-based procedures for specialist consultation. Referral to other GP/FP colleagues appears underutilized. A perceived lack of up to date skills and a lack of time appear to be concerns. GP/FPs working in Family Health Networks were more likely to perform these procedures themselves. Further studies would clarify the role of changes in medical education, the role of continuing education, and the impact of different remuneration models.

摘要

背景

我们预期能够实施小型门诊手术的加拿大家庭医生比例与实际医疗服务提供情况之间存在差异。这种模式尚未得到广泛研究。本研究的目的是确定加拿大安大略省一个小城市的全科医生/家庭医生提供四项小型门诊手术的当前模式和障碍。另一个目标是确定薪酬方式对这些服务提供的影响。

方法

向安大略省金斯顿市所有执业的全科医生/家庭医生邮寄了一份调查问卷。该研究测量的主要结果包括工作环境和薪酬方式、关于四项手术的当前手术操作情况、不进行手术的原因、当前技能水平以及提升技能的意愿。

结果

向金斯顿市所有108名全科医生/家庭医生邮寄了调查问卷。收集到了82%(89/108)的完整调查问卷,排除10份后,有79名符合条件的参与者。报告实施过该手术的全科医生/家庭医生百分比分别如下:皮肤切除术(63.3%)、子宫内膜活检(35.4%)、肩部注射(31.6%)和膝盖注射(43.0%)。大多数自己不进行手术的全科医生/家庭医生会将患者转诊给专科同事,而非其他全科医生/家庭医生。不进行特定手术最常提及的原因是“缺乏最新技能”,其次是“缺乏时间”。后者是在家庭健康网络工作的全科医生/家庭医生与按服务收费环境下工作的全科医生/家庭医生之间唯一报告的具有统计学意义的差异(26.7%对47.0%,卡方 = 4.191,p = 0.041)。

结论

安大略省金斯顿市大量的全科医生/家庭医生会将需要四项小型门诊手术之一的患者转诊至专科会诊。转诊给其他全科医生/家庭医生同事的情况似乎未得到充分利用。对缺乏最新技能和时间的担忧似乎存在。在家庭健康网络工作的全科医生/家庭医生更有可能自己实施这些手术。进一步的研究将阐明医学教育变革的作用、继续教育的作用以及不同薪酬模式的影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验