Eckhauser F E, Knol J A, Raper S E, Mulholland M W, Helzerman P
Division of GI Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Clin Ther. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):97-109.
A multicenter, open-label randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with imipenem-cilastatin (I-C) compared with combination therapy with clindamycin and an aminoglycoside (C+A) for treatment of 117 patients with serious intra-abdominal infections. Fifty-three patients (45%) received I-C and 64 patients (55%) received C+A. The overall clinical success rate was 96.2% for the I-C patients and 92.2% for the C+A patients. Clinical failure rates were 3.8% and 7.8%, respectively (P = NS). Eradication or suppression of pathogens was observed in 81.8% and 82.2% of patients, respectively. Uniform bacteriologic response was observed among all infection subgroups. Fourteen of 145 patients experienced adverse symptoms, including six of 66 (9.1%) monotherapy patients and eight of 79 (10.1%) combination-therapy patients (P = NS). The results of this study demonstrate that I-C monotherapy was as effective as C+A combination therapy for the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infections, regardless of the site or severity of infection or the clinical status of the patient. Both regimens also were found to be comparable in tolerability.
开展了一项多中心、开放标签随机试验,以评估亚胺培南-西司他丁(I-C)单药治疗与克林霉素和氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗(C+A)对117例严重腹腔内感染患者的疗效和耐受性。53例患者(45%)接受I-C治疗,64例患者(55%)接受C+A治疗。I-C组患者的总体临床成功率为96.2%,C+A组患者为92.2%。临床失败率分别为3.8%和7.8%(P=无统计学意义)。分别在81.8%和82.2%的患者中观察到病原体的根除或抑制。在所有感染亚组中均观察到一致的细菌学反应。145例患者中有14例出现不良症状,包括66例单药治疗患者中的6例(9.1%)和79例联合治疗患者中的8例(10.1%)(P=无统计学意义)。本研究结果表明,对于严重腹腔内感染的治疗,I-C单药治疗与C+A联合治疗同样有效,无论感染部位或严重程度,也无论患者的临床状况如何。两种治疗方案在耐受性方面也相当。