• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

作者信息

Angerås M H, Darle N, Hamnström K, Ekelund M, Engström L, Takala J, Viste A, Holme J B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ostra Hospital, University of Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):513-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037950.

DOI:10.3109/00365549609037950
PMID:8953684
Abstract

515 patients with intra-abdominal infection participated in an open randomized comparative multicenter trial in order to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of imipenem/cilastatin with cefuroxime/metronidazole. 258 patients (mean age 56 years) received imipenem/cilastatin 1.5-2.0 g/day, and 257 patients (mean age 54 years) received cefuroxime 3.0-4.5 g/day plus metronidazole 1.0-1.5 g/day for at least 3 days. 130/161 evaluable patients (80.8%) receiving imipenem/cilastatin and 124/145 evaluable patients (85.5%) receiving cefuroxime/metronidazole were clinically cured. The microbiological response was favorable in 86.9% in the imipenem/cilastatin group and in 90.8% in the cefuroxime/metronidazole group. The two treatment groups were similar with respect to median time to defervescence which was 4 days. The median duration of treatment was 6 days and the median time to discharge from hospital was 9 days in both groups. Drug-related adverse reactions were observed in 14 patients receiving iminpenem/cilastatin and in 8 patients receiving cefuroxime/metronidazole. 19 patients in the imipenen/cilastatin group and 12 patients in the cefuroxime/metronidazole group died. No correlation was found between the deaths and the study drugs. The present study shows that intra-abdominal infections can be treated successfully with imipenem/cilastatin as well as with cefuroxime/metronidazole.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):513-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037950.
2
Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: report from a Swedish Study Group.比阿培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:瑞典研究小组的报告
Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):507-12. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037949.
3
A randomized prospective study of cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.头孢吡肟加甲硝唑与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的随机前瞻性研究。
Infection. 2007 Jun;35(3):161-6. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-6237-2.
4
Imipenem/cilastatin (1.5 g daily) versus meropenem (3.0 g daily) in patients with intra-abdominal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial.亚胺培南/西司他丁(每日1.5克)与美罗培南(每日3.0克)治疗腹腔内感染患者的前瞻性、随机、多中心试验结果
Scand J Infect Dis. 1997;29(5):503-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549709011863.
5
[Infectious chemoprophylaxis in colorectal surgery. A multicenter study of imipenem-cilastatin vs. cefuroxime and metronidazole or cefotetan].
G Chir. 1991 Jun-Jul;12(6-7):393-5.
6
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cefepime Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.一项比较头孢吡肟加甲硝唑与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的随机双盲临床试验。头孢吡肟腹腔内感染研究组。
Arch Surg. 1997 Dec;132(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430360040008.
7
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jan;35(1):139-48. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.1.139.
8
Piperacillin/tazobactam compared with cefuroxime/ metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢呋辛/甲硝唑治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Eur J Surg. 1999 Sep;165(9):875-84. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189393.
9
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Dec;36(12):2766-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.12.2766.
10
A randomized multicenter trial of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Swedish Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗严重腹腔内感染的随机多中心试验。瑞典研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jan;31 Suppl A:79-85. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_a.79.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbapenem Antibiotics Versus Other Antibiotics for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: a Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (PROSPERO CRD42018108854).碳青霉烯类抗生素与其他抗生素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析 (PROSPERO CRD42018108854)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1208-1215. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05651-7. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
Carbapenems vs β-Lactam Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.碳青霉烯类药物与β-内酰胺类单药治疗或联合治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 9;6(10):ofz394. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz394. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Optimal Treatment for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Metronidazole.抗生素耐药时代复杂腹腔内感染的最佳治疗:甲硝唑联合治疗疗效与安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 7;3(3):ofw143. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw143. eCollection 2016 Sep.
4
Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria.联合治疗用于治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012 Jul;25(3):450-70. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05041-11.
5
Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.加拿大外科腹腔内感染诊疗指南
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010 Spring;21(1):11-37. doi: 10.1155/2010/580340.
6
[Complicated intra-abdominal infections: pathogens, resistance. Recommendations of the Infectliga on antbiotic therapy].[复杂性腹腔内感染:病原体、耐药性。感染联盟关于抗生素治疗的建议]
Chirurg. 2010 Jan;81(1):38-49. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1822-9.
7
Tigecycline in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and complicated skin and skin structure infections.替加环素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染和复杂性皮肤软组织感染。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Dec;3(6):1059-70.
8
[Antimicrobial and antimycotic therapy of intra-abdominal infections].[腹腔内感染的抗菌及抗真菌治疗]
Chirurg. 2008 Apr;79(4):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s00104-008-1484-z.
9
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
10
Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.他唑巴坦/哌拉西林与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001 Jan;19(1):79-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119010-00006.