Vermylen K, De Quincey G N Th, van 't Hof M A, Wolffe G N, Renggli H H
Department of Periodontology and Biomaterials, Catholic University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Mar;32(3):254-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00667.x.
The primary aim of this study is to define and classify root proximity. The secondary aim is to examine the reproducibility of the measurement tools, to study the prevalence per inter-dental area and to examine whether the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the bone crest (BC) differs between sites with root proximity and their contra-lateral sites without root proximity.
In order to indicate the location of root proximity, a modification of the Shei ruler was developed, dividing the roots into three equal parts. A radiographic template was used to measure the distance between the roots, in this way determining the severity of the root proximity. The reproducibility of the measurement tool was tested, the prevalence was calculated and the distances CEJ-BC for root proximity sites and contra-lateral sites were recorded.
A two-digit classification was obtained dividing the root into three locations [apical (A), between (B) and coronal (C)], with each location having the possibility of three different severities of root proximity. The described modification of the Shei ruler and the measurement tool for the severities can be considered as reproducible measurement tools. Root proximity was most prevalent in maxillary molars and between central and lateral incisors in the maxilla and mandible. There was no difference in CEJ-BC distance between the root proximity sites and their contra-lateral sites.
We can conclude that a two-digit classification for root proximity was established. Root proximity in untreated periodontal patients has no influence on the distance CEJ-BC. However, the location of root proximity becomes important from the moment that periodontal disease has been established at that site. The severity of root proximity is important for choosing treatment options. There is a striking similarity between bone loss patterns and tooth loss and the location of inter-dental spaces where root proximity is most prevalent.
本研究的主要目的是定义和分类牙根邻近距离。次要目的是检验测量工具的可重复性,研究每个牙间隙区域的患病率,并检查牙根相邻部位与其对侧无牙根相邻部位从牙骨质-釉质界(CEJ)到牙槽嵴顶(BC)的距离是否存在差异。
为了表明牙根相邻的位置,对谢伊标尺进行了改进,将牙根分为三个相等部分。使用射线照相模板测量牙根之间的距离,以此确定牙根相邻的严重程度。测试了测量工具的可重复性,计算了患病率,并记录了牙根相邻部位和对侧部位的CEJ-BC距离。
获得了一个两位数分类,将牙根分为三个位置[根尖部(A)、中部(B)和冠部(C)],每个位置都有可能出现三种不同严重程度的牙根相邻情况。所描述的对谢伊标尺的改进以及用于严重程度的测量工具可被视为可重复的测量工具。牙根相邻在上颌磨牙以及上颌和下颌的中切牙与侧切牙之间最为普遍。牙根相邻部位与其对侧部位的CEJ-BC距离没有差异。
我们可以得出结论,已建立了牙根相邻的两位数分类。未经治疗的牙周病患者的牙根相邻对CEJ-BC距离没有影响。然而,从该部位出现牙周病那一刻起,牙根相邻的位置就变得重要了。牙根相邻的严重程度对于选择治疗方案很重要。骨质丧失模式和牙齿缺失情况与牙根相邻最普遍的牙间隙位置之间存在显著相似性。