Chaudhri Sanjay, Brown Lesley, Hassan Imran, Horgan Alan F
University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):504-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0897-0.
Conventional practice in colorectal surgery involves stoma education being imparted postoperatively. Proficiency in stoma management often delays patients' discharge following colorectal surgery. The aim of this randomized, controlled trial was to compare preoperative intensive, community-based stoma education with conventional postoperative stoma education after elective colorectal surgery.
Forty-two elective colorectal patients requiring a stoma were randomized into an intensive preoperative teaching (study) or postoperative (control) group. Intervention for the study group included two preoperative visits in the community during which patients were taught with audiovisual aids to use and change the stoma pouching system. Goal-directed postoperative stoma education was standardized for both groups. Outcomes measured included time to stoma proficiency, postoperative hospital stay, unplanned stoma-related interventions in the community within six weeks of discharge, and preoperative and postoperative hospital anxiety and depression scores. Cost-effectiveness of the intervention was also evaluated.
All outcomes measured were improved in the study group, including time to stoma proficiency (5.5 vs. 9 days; P = 0.0005), hospital stay (8 vs. 10 days; P = 0.029), and unplanned stoma-related community interventions per patient (median 0 vs. 0.5; P = 0.0309). No adverse effects of the intervention were noted. The average cost saving per patient was pound 1,119 (dollar 2,104) for the study group compared with the control group.
Stoma education is more effective if undertaken in the preoperative setting. It results in shorter times to stoma proficiency and earlier discharge from the hospital. It also reduces stoma-related interventions in the community and has no adverse effects on patient well-being.
结直肠手术的传统做法是在术后进行造口护理教育。造口管理熟练程度往往会延迟结直肠手术后患者的出院时间。这项随机对照试验的目的是比较选择性结直肠手术后术前强化的、基于社区的造口教育与传统的术后造口教育。
42名需要造口的择期结直肠手术患者被随机分为术前强化教学组(研究组)或术后教学组(对照组)。研究组的干预措施包括在社区进行两次术前访视,期间利用视听辅助工具教导患者使用和更换造口袋系统。两组术后目标导向的造口教育均标准化。测量的结果包括达到造口熟练程度的时间、术后住院时间、出院后六周内在社区进行的计划外造口相关干预,以及术前和术后的医院焦虑和抑郁评分。还评估了干预措施的成本效益。
研究组所有测量结果均得到改善,包括达到造口熟练程度的时间(5.5天对9天;P = 0.0005)、住院时间(8天对10天;P = 0.029)以及每位患者计划外的造口相关社区干预(中位数0对0.5;P = 0.0309)。未观察到干预的不良影响。与对照组相比,研究组每位患者平均节省成本1119英镑(2104美元)。
术前进行造口教育更有效。它能缩短达到造口熟练程度的时间并使患者更早出院。还能减少社区中与造口相关的干预,且对患者健康无不良影响。