Suppr超能文献

术前强化、基于社区的造口教育与传统造口教育:一项随机对照试验。

Preoperative intensive, community-based vs. traditional stoma education: a randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Chaudhri Sanjay, Brown Lesley, Hassan Imran, Horgan Alan F

机构信息

University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):504-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0897-0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Conventional practice in colorectal surgery involves stoma education being imparted postoperatively. Proficiency in stoma management often delays patients' discharge following colorectal surgery. The aim of this randomized, controlled trial was to compare preoperative intensive, community-based stoma education with conventional postoperative stoma education after elective colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Forty-two elective colorectal patients requiring a stoma were randomized into an intensive preoperative teaching (study) or postoperative (control) group. Intervention for the study group included two preoperative visits in the community during which patients were taught with audiovisual aids to use and change the stoma pouching system. Goal-directed postoperative stoma education was standardized for both groups. Outcomes measured included time to stoma proficiency, postoperative hospital stay, unplanned stoma-related interventions in the community within six weeks of discharge, and preoperative and postoperative hospital anxiety and depression scores. Cost-effectiveness of the intervention was also evaluated.

RESULTS

All outcomes measured were improved in the study group, including time to stoma proficiency (5.5 vs. 9 days; P = 0.0005), hospital stay (8 vs. 10 days; P = 0.029), and unplanned stoma-related community interventions per patient (median 0 vs. 0.5; P = 0.0309). No adverse effects of the intervention were noted. The average cost saving per patient was pound 1,119 (dollar 2,104) for the study group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Stoma education is more effective if undertaken in the preoperative setting. It results in shorter times to stoma proficiency and earlier discharge from the hospital. It also reduces stoma-related interventions in the community and has no adverse effects on patient well-being.

摘要

目的

结直肠手术的传统做法是在术后进行造口护理教育。造口管理熟练程度往往会延迟结直肠手术后患者的出院时间。这项随机对照试验的目的是比较选择性结直肠手术后术前强化的、基于社区的造口教育与传统的术后造口教育。

方法

42名需要造口的择期结直肠手术患者被随机分为术前强化教学组(研究组)或术后教学组(对照组)。研究组的干预措施包括在社区进行两次术前访视,期间利用视听辅助工具教导患者使用和更换造口袋系统。两组术后目标导向的造口教育均标准化。测量的结果包括达到造口熟练程度的时间、术后住院时间、出院后六周内在社区进行的计划外造口相关干预,以及术前和术后的医院焦虑和抑郁评分。还评估了干预措施的成本效益。

结果

研究组所有测量结果均得到改善,包括达到造口熟练程度的时间(5.5天对9天;P = 0.0005)、住院时间(8天对10天;P = 0.029)以及每位患者计划外的造口相关社区干预(中位数0对0.5;P = 0.0309)。未观察到干预的不良影响。与对照组相比,研究组每位患者平均节省成本1119英镑(2104美元)。

结论

术前进行造口教育更有效。它能缩短达到造口熟练程度的时间并使患者更早出院。还能减少社区中与造口相关的干预,且对患者健康无不良影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验