Volinn Ernest, Nishikitani Mariko, Volinn Weining, Nakamura Yoshio, Yano Eiji
Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6):697-704. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155404.32725.f8.
This is a cross-national comparison of workers' compensation claims for back pain in Japan and the United States (US).
The main objective is to juxtapose rates of back pain claims in Japan and Washington state. Because the Washington state rate closely matches rates for other US states as well as the rate for the US as a whole, it is used to represent the US rate. A puzzle is to be framed: Why are back pain claim rates in Japan and the United States so disparate?
Occupational back pain is common among workers in both Japan and the United States. Wage compensation for time off work is also substantial in both countries and potentially induces time off work at least as much in Japan as in the United States. Accordingly, back pain claim rates in Japan seemingly would be on the same order of magnitude as rates in the United States.
Washington state rates are based on data from its state fund. Both Japan and Washington state rates are composed of the number of workers eligible to file worker compensation claims in a given year (denominator) and the number of back pain claims accepted during that year (numerator). Because rates may fluctuate from year-to-year, 5 years of data on rates are presented, 1995-1999. Central to the comparison are Japanese and Washington state rates of workers' compensation claims for back pain with more than 3 days compensated time loss from work.
The back pain claim rate in 1999 was 60 times higher in Washington state than in Japan. The disparity in rates for the other years in the study (1995-1998) was similar.
Back pain is common among workers both in Japan and the United States, but there is no simple or necessary relationship between that symptom and how it manifests itself in one country or another. Rather, the symptom is protean in its social manifestations. As for what shapes those manifestations-or, more specifically, what causes the startling disparity in back pain claim rates between Japan and the United States-that is a puzzle. Various solutions to the puzzle are discussed, but it remains essentially unsolved.
这是一项对日本和美国(美国)背痛工伤赔偿申请的跨国比较。
主要目的是对比日本和华盛顿州背痛索赔率。由于华盛顿州的比率与美国其他州以及美国整体比率密切匹配,因此用它来代表美国比率。提出一个谜题:为什么日本和美国的背痛索赔率如此不同?
职业性背痛在日本和美国的工人中都很常见。两国因休假而支付的工资补偿也相当可观,并且在日本至少与在美国一样有可能导致休假。因此,日本的背痛索赔率似乎应该与美国的索赔率处于同一数量级。
华盛顿州的比率基于其州基金的数据。日本和华盛顿州的比率都由特定年份有资格提出工伤赔偿申请的工人数量(分母)和该年接受的背痛索赔数量(分子)组成。由于比率可能逐年波动,所以列出了1995 - 1999年5年的比率数据。比较核心是日本和华盛顿州因背痛导致工作时间损失超过3天的工伤赔偿申请率。
1999年华盛顿州的背痛索赔率比日本高60倍。该研究其他年份(1995 - 1998年)的比率差异相似。
背痛在日本和美国的工人中都很常见,但该症状与其在一个国家或另一个国家的表现方式之间没有简单或必然的关系。相反,该症状在社会表现形式上具有多变性。至于是什么塑造了这些表现形式——或者更具体地说,是什么导致了日本和美国之间背痛索赔率惊人的差异——这是一个谜题。讨论了该谜题的各种解决方案,但基本上仍未解决。