Fawzi Nicolas L, Chubukov Victor, Clark Louis A, Brown Scott, Head-Gordon Teresa
UCSF/UCB Joint Graduate Group in Bioengineering, Department of Bioengineering, Donner 272, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Protein Sci. 2005 Apr;14(4):993-1003. doi: 10.1110/ps.041177505.
We simulate the aggregation thermodynamics and kinetics of proteins L and G, each of which self-assembles to the same alpha/beta [corrected] topology through distinct folding mechanisms. We find that the aggregation kinetics of both proteins at an experimentally relevant concentration exhibit both fast and slow aggregation pathways, although a greater proportion of protein G aggregation events are slow relative to those of found for protein L. These kinetic differences are correlated with the amount and distribution of intrachain contacts formed in the denatured state ensemble (DSE), or an intermediate state ensemble (ISE) if it exists, as well as the folding timescales of the two proteins. Protein G aggregates more slowly than protein L due to its rapidly formed folding intermediate, which exhibits native intrachain contacts spread across the protein, suggesting that certain early folding intermediates may be selected for by evolution due to their protective role against unwanted aggregation. Protein L shows only localized native structure in the DSE with timescales of folding that are commensurate with the aggregation timescale, leaving it vulnerable to domain swapping or nonnative interactions with other chains that increase the aggregation rate. Folding experiments that characterize the structural signatures of the DSE, ISE, or the transition state ensemble (TSE) under nonaggregating conditions should be able to predict regions where interchain contacts will be made in the aggregate, and to predict slower aggregation rates for proteins with contacts that are dispersed across the fold. Since proteins L and G can both form amyloid fibrils, this work also provides mechanistic and structural insight into the formation of prefibrillar species.
我们模拟了蛋白质L和G的聚集热力学和动力学,这两种蛋白质各自通过不同的折叠机制自组装成相同的α/β拓扑结构。我们发现,在实验相关浓度下,两种蛋白质的聚集动力学均呈现快速和慢速聚集途径,尽管相对于蛋白质L,蛋白质G的聚集事件中较慢的比例更大。这些动力学差异与变性态系综(DSE)中形成的链内接触的数量和分布相关,如果存在中间态系综(ISE),则也与ISE相关,同时还与两种蛋白质的折叠时间尺度有关。蛋白质G比蛋白质L聚集得更慢,这是因为其快速形成的折叠中间体,该中间体呈现出分布在整个蛋白质上的天然链内接触,这表明某些早期折叠中间体可能因其对不必要聚集的保护作用而被进化所选择。蛋白质L在DSE中仅显示局部天然结构,其折叠时间尺度与聚集时间尺度相当,这使其容易发生结构域交换或与其他链的非天然相互作用,从而增加聚集速率。在非聚集条件下表征DSE、ISE或过渡态系综(TSE)结构特征的折叠实验,应该能够预测聚集中链间接触将形成的区域,并预测具有分散在整个折叠结构中的接触的蛋白质的较慢聚集速率。由于蛋白质L和G都能形成淀粉样纤维,这项工作还为原纤维前体物种的形成提供了机制和结构方面的见解。