Pennebaker G E, Stewart W C
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992;230(2):111-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00164646.
We prospectively studied 152 glaucoma patients (192 eyes) and 31 normal subjects (31 eyes) tested with the 30-2 program and a customized temporal periphery program on the Humphrey Field Analyzer to determine the usefulness of routine testing temporal to the blind spot. We found that in 53 glaucomatous and each of 31 control eyes the central 30 degrees and temporal peripheral field were normal. In eyes with glaucomatous defects, testing temporal to the blind spot provided information equivalent to the central Bjerrum area in 66 eyes, less in 62 eyes, and more in 11 eyes. Temporal field testing was most useful in eyes with a diffusely depressed Bjerrum area (mean defect less than -8.30 dB). This study suggests that automated static perimetry commonly reveals glaucomatous defects temporal to the blind spot, but usually adds significant information over central testing only in patients with late visual field changes.
我们前瞻性地研究了152例青光眼患者(192只眼)和31名正常受试者(31只眼),使用汉弗莱视野分析仪的30-2程序和定制的颞侧周边程序进行检测,以确定在盲点颞侧进行常规检测的实用性。我们发现,在53只青光眼患眼和31只对照眼中,中央30度和颞侧周边视野均正常。在有青光眼性缺损的眼中,在盲点颞侧进行检测,在66只眼中提供的信息等同于中央 Bjerrum 区,在62只眼中提供的信息较少,在11只眼中提供的信息较多。颞侧视野检测在 Bjerrum 区弥漫性压低(平均缺损小于-8.30 dB)的眼中最有用。这项研究表明,自动静态视野检查通常能发现盲点颞侧的青光眼性缺损,但通常仅在晚期视野改变的患者中,相对于中央检测能增加显著的信息。