Seamone C, LeBlanc R, Rubillowicz M, Mann C, Orr A
Department of Ophthalmology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Aug 15;106(2):180-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90831-8.
We assessed 81 patients in four groups (normal, low- and high-risk ocular hypertension, and early glaucoma) with the standard Octopus G1 central visual field program in addition to two quantitative programs, PFN (peripheral field-nasal) and PFT (peripheral field-temporal), designed for this study to test the nasal and temporal periphery, respectively. Indices were calculated for each program for each subject in all groups. We then examined the behavior of the indices across the separate visual field areas within each group as well as the behavior of the indices of each field area among the different groups. We found that quantitative testing of the peripheral nasal visual field provided valuable information in the detection of glaucomatous visual dysfunction additional to that provided by quantitative testing of the central visual field. Quantitative testing of the temporal periphery was less valuable.
我们使用标准的Octopus G1中心视野程序以及为该研究设计的两个定量程序PFN(周边视野 - 鼻侧)和PFT(周边视野 - 颞侧),分别测试鼻侧和颞侧周边视野,对四组共81例患者进行了评估,这四组分别为正常组、低风险和高风险眼压过高组以及早期青光眼组。为所有组中的每个受试者计算每个程序的指数。然后,我们检查了每组内各个视野区域的指数行为,以及不同组之间每个视野区域的指数行为。我们发现,周边鼻侧视野的定量测试在检测青光眼性视觉功能障碍方面提供了有价值的信息,这是中心视野定量测试所无法提供的。颞侧周边视野的定量测试价值较小。