Grondin Simon, Roussel Marie-Eve, Gamache Pierre-Luc, Roy Martin, Ouellet Bastien
Ecole de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec G1K 7P4, Canada.
Perception. 2005;34(1):45-58. doi: 10.1068/p5369.
We investigated how does the structure of empty time intervals influence temporal processing. In experiment 1, the intervals to be discriminated were the silent durations marked by two sensory signals, both lasting 10 or 500 ms; these signals were two identical flashes (intramodal: VV), or one visual flash (V) followed by an auditory tone (A) (intermodal: VA). For the range of duration under investigation (standards = 0.2, 0.6, 1, or 1.4 s), the results indicated that both the marker length and sensory mode influenced discrimination, but no interaction between these variables or between one of these variables and standard duration was significant. In experiment 2, we compared, for each of four marker-type conditions (VV, AA, VA, AV; and standard = 1 s), intervals marked by two 10 ms signals with intervals marked by unequal signal length (markers 1 and 2 lasting 10 and 500 ms, or 500 and 10 ms). As in experiment 1, the results revealed significant marker-mode and marker-length effects, but no significant interaction between these variables. Experiment 3 showed that, for the same conditions as in experiment 2, perceived duration is not influenced by marker length and that the variability of interval reproductions does not depend on the perceived duration of intervals. The results are discussed in the light of a single-clock hypothesis: marker-length and marker-mode effects are presented as being non-temporal sources of variability associated mainly with sensory and memory processes.
我们研究了空时间间隔的结构如何影响时间处理。在实验1中,要区分的间隔是由两个感觉信号标记的无声持续时间,两个信号持续时间均为10或500毫秒;这些信号是两个相同的闪光(模态内:VV),或者一个视觉闪光(V)后跟一个听觉音调(A)(模态间:VA)。对于所研究的持续时间范围(标准值 = 0.2、0.6、1或1.4秒),结果表明标记长度和感觉模式都影响辨别,但这些变量之间或其中一个变量与标准持续时间之间没有显著的交互作用。在实验2中,我们针对四种标记类型条件(VV、AA、VA、AV;标准值 = 1秒)中的每一种,比较了由两个10毫秒信号标记的间隔与由不等信号长度(标记1和2持续10毫秒和500毫秒,或500毫秒和10毫秒)标记的间隔。与实验1一样,结果显示出显著的标记模式和标记长度效应,但这些变量之间没有显著的交互作用。实验3表明,在与实验2相同的条件下,感知持续时间不受标记长度的影响,并且间隔再现的变异性不取决于间隔的感知持续时间。根据单时钟假设对结果进行了讨论:标记长度和标记模式效应被认为是主要与感觉和记忆过程相关的非时间变异性来源。