Azari Leila, Mioni Giovanna, Rousseau Robert, Grondin Simon
École de Psychologie, Université Laval, 2325 rue des Bibliothèques, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1473-1487. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01900-7.
In this 3-experiment study, the Weber fractions in the 300-ms and 900-ms duration ranges are obtained with 9 types of empty intervals resulting from the combinations of three types of signals for marking the beginning and end of the signals: auditory (A), visual (V), or tactile (T). There were three types of intramodal intervals (AA, TT, and VV) and 6 types of intermodal intervals (AT, AV, VA, VT, TA, and TV). The second marker is always the same during Experiments 1 (A), 2 (V), and 3 (T). With an uncertainty strategy where the first marker is 1 of 2 sensory signals being presented randomly from trial to trial, the study provides direct comparisons of the perceived length of the different marker-type intervals. The results reveal that the Weber fraction is nearly constant in the three types of intramodal intervals, but is clearly lower at 900 ms than at 300 ms in intermodal conditions. In several cases, the intramodal intervals are perceived as shorter than intermodal intervals, which is interpreted as an effect of the efficiency in detecting the second marker of an intramodal interval. There were no significant differences between the TA and VA intervals (Experiment 1) and between the AV and TV intervals (Experiment 2), but in Experiment 3, the AT intervals were perceived as longer than the VT intervals. The results are interpreted in terms of the generalized form of Weber's law, using the properties of the signals for explaining the additional nontemporal noise observed in the intermodal conditions.
在这项包含三个实验的研究中,通过三种用于标记信号开始和结束的信号组合产生的9种空时间间隔,获取了300毫秒和900毫秒持续时间范围内的韦伯分数:听觉(A)、视觉(V)或触觉(T)。存在三种模式内时间间隔(AA、TT和VV)以及6种模式间时间间隔(AT、AV、VA、VT、TA和TV)。在实验1(A)、2(V)和3(T)期间,第二个标记始终相同。通过一种不确定性策略,即第一个标记是每次试验中随机呈现的2种感觉信号之一,该研究提供了不同标记类型时间间隔的感知长度的直接比较。结果表明,在三种模式内时间间隔中,韦伯分数几乎恒定,但在模式间条件下,900毫秒时的韦伯分数明显低于300毫秒时的。在几种情况下,模式内时间间隔被感知为比模式间时间间隔短,这被解释为检测模式内时间间隔的第二个标记的效率的影响。在TA和VA时间间隔之间(实验1)以及AV和TV时间间隔之间(实验2)没有显著差异,但在实验3中,AT时间间隔被感知为比VT时间间隔长。利用信号的特性来解释在模式间条件下观察到的额外非时间噪声,根据韦伯定律的广义形式对结果进行了解释。