Ishihara Hironori, Nakamura Hitomi, Okawa Hirobumi, Takase Hajime, Tsubo Toshihito, Hirota Kazuyoshi
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hirosaki School of Medicine, Hirosaki-Shi, Japan.
Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):R144-9. doi: 10.1186/cc3047. Epub 2005 Feb 11.
We previously reported that initial distribution volume of glucose (IDVG) reflects central extracellular fluid volume, and that IDVG may represent an indirect measure of cardiac preload that is independent of the plasma glucose values present before glucose injection or infusion of insulin and/or vasoactive drugs. The original IDVG measurement requires an accurate glucose analyzer and repeated arterial blood sampling over a period of 7 min after glucose injection. The purpose of the present study was to compare approximated IDVG, derived from just two blood samples, versus original IDVG, and to test whether approximated IDVG is an acceptable alternative measure of IDVG in the intensive care unit.
A total of 50 consecutive intensive care unit patients were included, and the first IDVG determination in each patient was analyzed. Glucose (5 g) was injected through the central venous line to calculate IDVG. Original IDVG was calculated using a one-compartment model from serial incremental arterial plasma glucose concentrations above preinjection using a reference glucose analyzer. Approximated IDVG was calculated from glucose concentrations in both plasma and whole blood, using a combined blood gas and glucose analyzer, drawn at two time points: immediately before glucose injection and 3 min after injection. Subsequently, each approximated IDVG was calculated using a formula we proposed previously.
The difference (mean +/- standard deviation) between approximated IDVG calculated from plasma samples and original IDVG was -0.05 +/- 0.54 l, and the difference between approximated IDVG calculated from whole blood samples and original IDVG was -0.04 +/- 0.61 l. There was a linear correlation between approximated and original IDVG (r2 = 0.92 for plasma samples, and r2 = 0.89 for whole blood samples).
Our findings demonstrate that there was good correlation between each approximated IDVG and original IDVG, although the two measures are not interchangeable. This suggests that approximated IDVG is clinically acceptable as an alternative calculation of IDVG, although approximated and original IDVGs are not equivalent; plasma rather than whole blood measurements are preferable.
我们之前报道过,葡萄糖初始分布容积(IDVG)反映中心细胞外液容积,且IDVG可能代表一种独立于葡萄糖注射前或胰岛素和/或血管活性药物输注前血浆葡萄糖值的心脏前负荷间接测量指标。最初的IDVG测量需要一台精确的葡萄糖分析仪,并在葡萄糖注射后7分钟内重复采集动脉血样。本研究的目的是比较仅从两份血样得出的近似IDVG与原始IDVG,并测试近似IDVG在重症监护病房是否是IDVG的可接受替代测量指标。
共纳入50例连续的重症监护病房患者,并分析每位患者的首次IDVG测定结果。通过中心静脉导管注射5克葡萄糖以计算IDVG。使用参考葡萄糖分析仪,根据注射前以上的系列递增动脉血浆葡萄糖浓度,采用单室模型计算原始IDVG。使用血气和葡萄糖联合分析仪,在两个时间点采集血浆和全血中的葡萄糖浓度来计算近似IDVG:葡萄糖注射前即刻和注射后3分钟。随后,使用我们之前提出的公式计算每个近似IDVG。
从血浆样本计算出的近似IDVG与原始IDVG之间的差异(均值±标准差)为-0.05±0.54升,从全血样本计算出的近似IDVG与原始IDVG之间的差异为-0.04±0.61升。近似IDVG与原始IDVG之间存在线性相关性(血浆样本的r2 = 0.92,全血样本的r2 = 0.89)。
我们的研究结果表明,每个近似IDVG与原始IDVG之间存在良好的相关性,尽管这两种测量方法不可互换。这表明,尽管近似IDVG与原始IDVG不等同,但近似IDVG作为IDVG的替代计算方法在临床上是可接受的;血浆测量优于全血测量。