Suppr超能文献

婴儿过度哭闹与胃食管反流病:生物学与文化的错位

Excessive crying and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in infants: misalignment of biology and culture.

作者信息

Douglas Pamela S

机构信息

Centre for General Practice, University of Queensland Medical School, Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia.

出版信息

Med Hypotheses. 2005;64(5):887-98. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.12.009.

Abstract

Excessive crying is the most common problem presenting to the doctor in the first months of life in western industrialised societies, affecting up to 30% of infants. There has been an exponential increase in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in babies who cry excessively over the past few decades, and many parents believe their crying infant "has reflux". This paper proposes that culturocentric assumptions have confused interpretation of research into GORD, and re-examines the findings of GORD research from the perspective of evolutionary biology. Evolutionary biologists argue that the human infant is an exterogestate foetus for at least the first six months of life, dependent on maternal co-regulation for optimal physiological function. However, infant-care practices in western industrialised societies shifted towards an emphasis on infant autonomy at the time of the Industrial Revolution. From the perspective of evolutionary biology, a misalignment between western culture and the biological expectations of the infant developed over two million years of evolution may result in excessive crying in less adapted babies. The key biocultural factors that impact on infant distress are feeding management, parental responsiveness, sensory nourishment and sleep management. When the concept of the human infant as an exterogestate foetus is integrated with the findings of GORD research, a hypothesis and its corollary emerge. This hypothesis proposes that infant GORD is a physiological manifestation of misalignment between biology and culture, and proposes, as a corollary, that if the impact of biocultural factors upon the physiology of otherwise well crying babies is not addressed in the first months of life, populations of infants who cry excessively may be predisposed to GORD after three to four months of age. If this hypothesis is correct, an integrated clinical approach to crying babies less than three to four months of age that considers feeding management (e.g., frequent feeds, breast- or bottle-feeding technique, referral to a lactation consultant, cow's milk allergy), parental responsiveness (e.g., prompt response to infant cues), sensory nourishment (e.g., sling or backpack, walks, massage) and sleep management (e.g., nocturnal co-sleeping) should, firstly, decrease crying when applied to infants less than three to four months of age, and secondly, decrease the incidence of GORD in these infants once they are older than three to four months of age. Thirdly, if this hypothesis is correct, combining the integrated approach with pharmaceutical intervention should improve outcomes in infants diagnosed with GORD.

摘要

在西方工业化社会,过度哭闹是婴儿出生后头几个月里最常见的就医问题,影响着多达30%的婴儿。在过去几十年里,过度哭闹婴儿的胃食管反流病(GORD)诊断呈指数级增长,许多家长认为他们哭闹的婴儿“有反流”。本文提出,以文化为中心的假设混淆了对GORD研究的解读,并从进化生物学的角度重新审视了GORD研究的结果。进化生物学家认为,人类婴儿在出生后的至少头六个月是宫外胎儿,依赖母亲的共同调节以实现最佳生理功能。然而,西方工业化社会的婴儿护理方式在工业革命时期转向了强调婴儿自主性。从进化生物学的角度来看,西方文化与经过两百多万年进化形成的婴儿生物学预期之间的失调,可能导致适应性较差的婴儿过度哭闹。影响婴儿痛苦的关键生物文化因素包括喂养管理、父母的反应性、感官滋养和睡眠管理。当将人类婴儿作为宫外胎儿的概念与GORD研究结果相结合时,一个假设及其推论就出现了。这个假设提出婴儿GORD是生物学与文化失调的生理表现,并作为推论提出,如果在婴儿出生后的头几个月里不解决生物文化因素对原本健康哭闹婴儿生理的影响,过度哭闹的婴儿群体在三到四个月大后可能易患GORD。如果这个假设是正确的,那么对于三到四个月以下哭闹婴儿的综合临床方法,即考虑喂养管理(如频繁喂养、母乳喂养或奶瓶喂养技术、转诊至哺乳顾问、牛奶过敏)、父母的反应性(如对婴儿暗示的及时回应)、感官滋养(如背巾或背包、散步、按摩)和睡眠管理(如夜间同睡),首先,应用于三到四个月以下婴儿时应减少哭闹,其次,当这些婴儿超过三到四个月大时应降低GORD的发病率。第三,如果这个假设是正确的,将综合方法与药物干预相结合应该会改善被诊断为GORD的婴儿的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验