van Pinxteren Sors A T, Lohuis Peter J F M, Ingels Koen J A O, Nolst Trenité Gilbert J
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;7(2):138-42. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.7.2.138.
To assess the interest of Dutch otorhinolaryngologists in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS).
We conducted a 22-question survey among otorhinolaryngology physicians and residents concerning their experience with and interest in FPRS. The response rate was 71% (335/475; 275 physicians and 60 residents).
Most respondents associated FPRS with rhinoplasty, otoplasty, and the reconstruction of skin cancer defects. Of the physicians, 81% said that 1% to 33% of their practice involves FPRS; 62% were satisfied with this percentage, whereas 36% would like it to be higher. Approximately 70% of physicians regarded their training in FPRS as insufficient, although most (70%) had taken supplementary courses. Moreover, 73% of the otorhinolaryngology physicians and 72% of all respondents said that FPRS should be taught during and after residency, with a preference for hands-on courses. Finally, 84% of all respondents thought that FPRS should be part of the field of otorhinolaryngology, whereas 48% thought that it should become a subspecialty.
There is interest in integrating FPRS training into the Dutch otorhinolaryngology residency program, as it is in the United States.
评估荷兰耳鼻喉科医生对面部整形与重建外科(FPRS)的兴趣。
我们对耳鼻喉科医生和住院医师进行了一项包含22个问题的调查,内容涉及他们在FPRS方面的经验和兴趣。回复率为71%(335/475;275名医生和60名住院医师)。
大多数受访者将FPRS与鼻整形术、耳整形术以及皮肤癌缺损修复联系起来。在医生中,81%表示其业务的1%至33%涉及FPRS;62%对这一比例感到满意,而36%希望该比例更高。约70%的医生认为他们在FPRS方面的培训不足,尽管大多数(70%)参加过补充课程。此外,73%的耳鼻喉科医生和72%的所有受访者表示,FPRS应在住院医师培训期间及之后进行教学,且更倾向于实践课程。最后,84%的所有受访者认为FPRS应成为耳鼻喉科领域的一部分,而48%认为它应成为一个亚专业。
与美国一样,荷兰对将FPRS培训纳入耳鼻喉科住院医师培训项目存在兴趣。