Johnson C, Archer R P, Sheaffer C I, Miller D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk 23501.
J Pers Assess. 1992 Apr;58(2):277-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5802_7.
Although the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory (MAPI) are both widely used in the clinical assessment of adolescents, no research has examined the interrelationship between these two instruments. We investigated MMPI and MAPI responses from 199 adolescents assessed at entrance to inpatient or outpatient psychiatric programs in Florida and Virginia. Univariate correlation analyses identified areas of significant associations between these measures, with coefficients ranging widely from -.70 to .72. Substantial diagnostic differences were found between these instruments. The MAPI, for example, yielded no depression-related diagnoses, but produced many more adjustment disorder and personality disorder diagnoses than the MMPI. The rates of diagnostic assignment agreements between diagnoses produced by clinical judgment, MMPI findings, and MAPI interpretive reports were typically quite low.
尽管明尼苏达多相人格问卷(MMPI)和米隆青少年人格问卷(MAPI)在青少年临床评估中都被广泛使用,但尚无研究考察这两种工具之间的相互关系。我们调查了佛罗里达州和弗吉尼亚州199名青少年在进入住院或门诊精神科项目时的MMPI和MAPI反应。单变量相关分析确定了这些测量之间显著关联的领域,系数范围从-.70到.72。在这些工具之间发现了实质性的诊断差异。例如,MAPI没有得出与抑郁相关的诊断,但比MMPI产生了更多的适应障碍和人格障碍诊断。临床判断、MMPI结果和MAPI解释报告所产生的诊断之间的诊断分配一致率通常相当低。