Wise E A
Mental Health Resources, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):569-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_7.
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) overlapping and nonoverlapping scales were demonstrated to perform comparably to their original MMPI forms. They were then evaluated for convergent and discriminant validity with the Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (MCMI-II) personality disorder scales. The MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder scales demonstrated convergent and discriminant coefficients similar to their original forms. However, the MMPI-2 personality scales classified significantly more of the sample as Dramatic, whereas the MCMI-II diagnosed more of the sample as Anxious. Furthermore, single-scale and 2-point code type classification rates were quite low, indicating that at the level of the individual, the personality disorder scales are not measuring comparable constructs. Hence, each instrument is providing similar and unique information, justifying their continued use together for the purpose of diagnosing personality disorders.
明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI - 2)的重叠量表和非重叠量表被证明与原始MMPI形式表现相当。随后,研究人员使用米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI - II)人格障碍量表对它们进行了聚合效度和区分效度评估。MMPI - 2和MCMI - II人格障碍量表的聚合系数和区分系数与原始形式相似。然而,MMPI - 2人格量表将更多的样本归类为戏剧型人格,而MCMI - II则将更多的样本诊断为焦虑型人格。此外,单量表和两点编码类型的分类率相当低,这表明在个体层面,人格障碍量表测量的并非可比的结构。因此,每种工具都提供了相似但独特的信息,这证明了它们继续共同用于诊断人格障碍的合理性。