Suppr超能文献

使用平板型电子射野影像装置进行三维调强放射治疗验证。

Three-dimensional IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID.

作者信息

Steciw S, Warkentin B, Rathee S, Fallone B G

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta T6G IZ2, Canada.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2005 Feb;32(2):600-12. doi: 10.1118/1.1843471.

Abstract

A three-dimensional (3D) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) pretreatment verification procedure has been developed based on the measurement of two-dimensional (2D) primary fluence profiles using an amorphous silicon flat-panel electronic portal imaging device (EPID). As described in our previous work, fluence profiles are extracted from EPID images by deconvolution with kernels that represent signal spread in the EPID due to radiation and optical scattering. The deconvolution kernels are derived using Monte Carlo simulations of dose deposition in the EPID and empirical fitting methods, for both 6 and 15 MV photon energies. In our new 3D verification technique, 2D fluence modulation profiles for each IMRT field in a treatment are used as input to a treatment planning system (TPS), which then generates 3D doses. Verification is accomplished by comparing this new EPID-based 3D dose distribution to the planned dose distribution calculated by the TPS. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) point dose measurements for an IMRT treatment of an anthropomorphic phantom were in good agreement with the EPID-based 3D doses; in contrast, the planned dose under-predicts the TLD measurement in a high-gradient region by approximately 16%. Similarly, large discrepancies between EPID-based and TPS doses were also evident in dose profiles of small fields incident on a water phantom. These results suggest that our 3D EPID-based method is effective in quantifying relevant uncertainties in the dose calculations of our TPS for IMRT treatments. For three clinical head and neck cancer IMRT treatment plans, our TPS was found to underestimate the mean EPID-based doses in the critical structures of the spinal cord and the parotids by approximately 4 Gy (11%-14%). According to radiobiological modeling calculations that were performed, such underestimates can potentially lead to clinically significant underpredictions of normal tissue complication rates.

摘要

基于使用非晶硅平板电子射野影像装置(EPID)测量二维(2D)初始注量分布,已开发出一种三维(3D)调强放射治疗(IMRT)预处理验证程序。如我们之前的工作所述,通过与代表由于辐射和光学散射在EPID中信号扩散的核进行去卷积,从EPID图像中提取注量分布。对于6和15 MV光子能量,去卷积核是使用EPID中剂量沉积的蒙特卡罗模拟和经验拟合方法得出的。在我们新的3D验证技术中,将治疗中每个IMRT射野的2D注量调制分布用作治疗计划系统(TPS)的输入,然后TPS生成3D剂量。通过将这种基于EPID的新3D剂量分布与TPS计算的计划剂量分布进行比较来完成验证。对一个人体模型进行IMRT治疗的热释光剂量计(TLD)点剂量测量与基于EPID的3D剂量高度一致;相比之下,在高梯度区域计划剂量比TLD测量值低约16%。同样,在入射到水模体上的小射野的剂量分布中,基于EPID的剂量与TPS剂量之间也存在明显差异。这些结果表明,我们基于3D EPID的方法在量化我们用于IMRT治疗的TPS剂量计算中的相关不确定性方面是有效的。对于三个临床头颈部癌IMRT治疗计划,我们发现我们的TPS在脊髓和腮腺等关键结构中低估了基于EPID的平均剂量约4 Gy(11%-14%)。根据所进行的放射生物学建模计算,这种低估可能会导致对正常组织并发症发生率的临床显著低估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验