Karno Mitchell P, Longabaugh Richard
Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;73(2):262-7. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.262.
In this study, the authors examined the impact of the interaction between clients' trait reactance and therapists' directiveness on the effectiveness of psychotherapy treatment for alcoholism. Ratings of videotaped treatment sessions were used to measure clients' reactance (N=141) and therapists' directiveness. Models tested for the interaction as a predictor of 1-year posttreatment drinking quantity and frequency. Results indicate that directiveness had a negative impact on outcomes for clients at medium and high levels of reactance but did not affect drinking among clients low in reactance. Increased therapist use of interpretation, confrontation, and introduction of topics was most predictive of more frequent and larger quantities of drinking among reactant clients. This study suggests that research on treatment process can yield significant theoretical and clinical benefits.
在本研究中,作者考察了来访者特质反抗性与治疗师指导性之间的相互作用对酒精成瘾心理治疗效果的影响。通过对录像治疗 session 的评分来测量来访者的反抗性(N = 141)和治疗师的指导性。对作为治疗后 1 年饮酒量和频率预测指标的相互作用进行了模型测试。结果表明,指导性对中高水平反抗性的来访者的治疗结果有负面影响,但对低反抗性的来访者的饮酒情况没有影响。治疗师更多地使用解释、对峙和引入话题最能预测反抗性来访者更频繁、饮酒量更大。本研究表明,对治疗过程的研究可产生重大的理论和临床效益。