Karno Mitchell P, Longabaugh Richard
Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California-Los Angeles, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.
Addiction. 2007 Apr;102(4):587-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01754.x. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
This study assessed the predictive validity of the level of matching and mismatching between patients' personal attributes and aspects of outpatient psychotherapy they received.
On the basis of patient-by-treatment interactions observed for this sample in previous research, patients with alcohol abuse or dependence (n = 137) were designated retrospectively as being matched, unmatched or mismatched on each of four patient and treatment variable pairings. These pairings included (1) patient depressive symptoms and therapy emotion focus, (2) patient trait anger and therapy confrontation, (3) patient interpersonal reactance and therapy confrontation and (4) patient interpersonal reactance and therapy structure.
Analyses of variance and logistic regression were used to assess the individual and additive effects of being matched and mismatched on the percentage of abstinent days (PDA) and recovery status in the year after treatment.
Being mismatched on any of the four patient-treatment pairings was a significant predictor of more frequent alcohol use post-treatment. Being matched on only two pairings predicted less frequent alcohol use, namely matches on therapy emotion focus with patient depressive symptoms and therapy structure with patient reactance. Matches appeared to optimize otherwise good outcomes, while mismatches had larger effect sizes and tended to predict relatively poor outcomes. The data supported the presence of an additive effect for mismatches on post-treatment PDA. The group with the most mismatches fared considerably worse than a group with fewer mismatches. Several matches and mismatches also predicted recovery status, with some support found for additive effects.
Mismatches between patient attributes and treatment appear to have serious consequences, and this effect is magnified with multiple mismatches. Matches, on the other hand, while beneficial, may not be necessary to achieve good outcomes.
本研究评估了患者个人属性与所接受的门诊心理治疗各方面之间匹配与不匹配程度的预测效度。
基于先前研究中对该样本观察到的患者与治疗的相互作用,酒精滥用或依赖患者(n = 137)在四个患者与治疗变量配对中的每一对上被回顾性地指定为匹配、不匹配或不完全匹配。这些配对包括:(1)患者抑郁症状与治疗情感焦点;(2)患者特质愤怒与治疗对抗;(3)患者人际反应与治疗对抗;(4)患者人际反应与治疗结构。
方差分析和逻辑回归用于评估匹配和不匹配对治疗后一年戒酒天数百分比(PDA)和康复状态的个体及累加效应。
在四个患者 - 治疗配对中的任何一个上不匹配是治疗后饮酒更频繁的显著预测因素。仅在两个配对上匹配可预测饮酒频率较低,即治疗情感焦点与患者抑郁症状的匹配以及治疗结构与患者反应性的匹配。匹配似乎能优化原本良好的结果,而不匹配的效应量更大,且往往预测相对较差的结果。数据支持不匹配对治疗后PDA存在累加效应。不匹配最多的组比不匹配较少的组情况要差得多。一些匹配和不匹配也预测了康复状态,且发现了一些累加效应的证据。
患者属性与治疗之间的不匹配似乎会产生严重后果,且这种效应在多个不匹配时会被放大。另一方面,匹配虽然有益,但对于取得良好结果可能并非必要。