• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在扫视搜索和自由观看中,返回抑制并非觅食促进因素。

Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing.

作者信息

Hooge Ignace Th C, Over Eelco A B, van Wezel Richard J A, Frens Maarten A

机构信息

Psychonomics, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(14):1901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.030.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.030
PMID:15797779
Abstract

The ability to search and scan the environment effectively is a prerequisite for spatial behavior. A longstanding theory proposes that inhibition of previously attended loci (Inhibition of return; IOR) serves to facilitate exploration by increasing the likelihood to inspect new areas instead of returning to locations that have been inspected before. In this eye movement study we tested whether we could find evidence in favor of this hypothesis. Here we report that IOR does occur during search and free viewing, because we found increased fixation times preceding return saccades (eye movements that return to previously fixated locations). Meanwhile we observed no influence of IOR on the search strategy. Rather than the predicted low number we found many return saccades. Therefore, IOR does not serve as a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing. We hypothesize that IOR is an intrinsic aspect of shifting attention and gaze direction and furthermore that it is not always advantageous to prevent return saccades.

摘要

有效搜索和扫视环境的能力是空间行为的一个先决条件。一个长期存在的理论认为,抑制先前关注的位点(返回抑制;IOR)有助于通过增加检查新区域而非返回之前检查过的位置的可能性来促进探索。在这项眼动研究中,我们测试了是否能找到支持这一假设的证据。在此我们报告,IOR在搜索和自由观看过程中确实会出现,因为我们发现在返回扫视(回到先前注视位置的眼动)之前注视时间增加。同时,我们观察到IOR对搜索策略没有影响。我们发现了许多返回扫视,而不是预测的低数量。因此,IOR在扫视搜索和自由观看中并不是一种觅食促进因素。我们假设IOR是转移注意力和注视方向的一个内在方面,此外,防止返回扫视并不总是有利的。

相似文献

1
Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing.在扫视搜索和自由观看中,返回抑制并非觅食促进因素。
Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(14):1901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.030.
2
Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.回顾沃尔多效应:动眼抑制返回并不妨碍返回注视。
J Vis. 2011 Jan 4;11(1):3. doi: 10.1167/11.1.3.
3
Effect of previously fixated locations on saccade trajectory during free visual search.自由视觉搜索过程中先前注视位置对扫视轨迹的影响。
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(22):3831-44. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
4
Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search?动眼返回抑制是否会影响场景搜索过程中的注视概率?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2384-98. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0191-x.
5
Saccades and microsaccades during visual fixation, exploration, and search: foundations for a common saccadic generator.视觉注视、探索和搜索过程中的扫视和微扫视:共同扫视发生器的基础
J Vis. 2008 Dec 18;8(14):21.1-18. doi: 10.1167/8.14.21.
6
Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference.返回抑制与眼动干扰。
Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.035.
7
Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return.灵长类动物上丘对返回抑制的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;14(8):1256-63. doi: 10.1162/089892902760807249.
8
Coarse-to-fine eye movement strategy in visual search.视觉搜索中从粗到细的眼动策略。
Vision Res. 2007 Aug;47(17):2272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
9
Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.扫视轨迹偏差与返回抑制:测量注意力加工量
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.021. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
10
Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.新颖性并非总是最佳策略:视任务情况而定的返回抑制和返回促进。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):333-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
One factor to bind them all: visual foraging organization to predict patch leaving behavior with ROC curves.一个因素统揽全局:用视觉觅食组织和ROC曲线预测离开斑块行为
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Apr 5;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00624-7.
2
Foraging with your eyes: a novel task to study cognitive strategies involved in (visual) foraging behaviour.用眼觅食:一项用于研究(视觉)觅食行为中所涉及认知策略的新任务。
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01261-0.
3
A robotics-inspired scanpath model reveals the importance of uncertainty and semantic object cues for gaze guidance in dynamic scenes.
一种受机器人启发的扫描路径模型揭示了不确定性和语义对象线索对动态场景中注视引导的重要性。
J Vis. 2025 Feb 3;25(2):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.2.6.
4
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 2: From research question to operationalization.眼动追踪基础(第二部分):从研究问题到可操作性
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 24;57(2):73. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02590-2.
5
Motor "laziness" constrains fixation selection in real-world tasks.运动“惰性”限制了现实世界任务中的注视选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 19;121(12):e2302239121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302239121. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
6
Refixation behavior in naturalistic viewing: Methods, mechanisms, and neural correlates.自然观看中的重新注视行为:方法、机制及神经关联
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jan;87(1):25-49. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02836-9. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
7
Planning to revisit: Neural activity in refixation precursors.计划回访:再注视前导的神经活动。
J Vis. 2023 Jul 3;23(7):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.7.2.
8
Between the Scenes.幕后故事。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):185-195. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000556. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
9
Stimulus-specific plasticity of macaque V1 spike rates and gamma.刺激特异性猕猴 V1 尖峰速率和伽马的可塑性。
Cell Rep. 2021 Dec 7;37(10):110086. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110086.
10
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.引导式搜索 6.0:一种更新的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5.