Hooge Ignace T C, Nuthmann Antje, Nyström Marcus, Niehorster Diederick C, Holleman Gijs A, Andersson Richard, Hessels Roy S
Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martinus J. Langeveldgebouw, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 24;57(2):73. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02590-2.
In this article, we discuss operationalizations and examples of experimental design in eye-tracking research. First, we distinguish direct operationalization for entities like saccades, which are closely aligned with their original concepts, and indirect operationalization for concepts not directly measurable, such as attention or mind-wandering. The latter relies on selecting a measurable proxy. Second, we highlight the variability in algorithmic operationalizations and emphasize that changing parameters can affect outcome measures. Transparency in reporting these parameters and algorithms is crucial for comparisons across studies. Third, we provide references to studies for common operationalizations in eye-tracking research and discuss key operationalizations in reading research. Fourth, the IO-model is introduced as a tool to help researchers operationalize difficult concepts. Finally, we present three example experiments with useful methods for eye-tracking research, encouraging readers to consider these examples for inspiration in their own experiments.
在本文中,我们讨论眼动追踪研究中实验设计的操作化方法及示例。首先,我们区分了与原始概念紧密相关的实体(如扫视)的直接操作化,以及对注意力或走神等不可直接测量的概念的间接操作化。后者依赖于选择一个可测量的代理变量。其次,我们强调算法操作化中的变异性,并强调改变参数可能会影响结果测量。报告这些参数和算法时保持透明对于不同研究之间的比较至关重要。第三,我们提供了眼动追踪研究中常见操作化方法的研究参考文献,并讨论了阅读研究中的关键操作化方法。第四,引入IO模型作为一种工具,帮助研究人员对难以操作化的概念进行操作化。最后,我们展示了三个示例实验,介绍了眼动追踪研究中有用的方法,鼓励读者在自己的实验中参考这些示例以获取灵感。