de Coster Liesbeth, Leentjens Albert F G, Lodder Jan, Verhey Frans R J
Department of Psychiatry, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;20(4):358-62. doi: 10.1002/gps.1290.
Somatic and neurocognitive symptoms of depression may overlap with the physical symptoms of stroke, and thus make the diagnosis of post-stroke depression difficult.
To assess the sensitivity of individual depressive symptoms and their contribution to the diagnosis of post-stroke depression.
Two hundred and six patients with first-ever stroke, participating in a longitudinal study, were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). In a discriminant analysis the relative contribution of the individual HAM-D items to the diagnosis of major depressive disorder was evaluated.
The cumulative incidence of post-stroke major depressive disorder was 32%. The discriminant model based on HAM-D item scores was highly significant (p<0.001) and classified 88.3% of patients correctly as depressed or nondepressed. As expected, 'depressed mood' discriminated best between depressed and non-depressed stroke patients. 'Reduced interests' had a relatively low sensitivity and may in part reflect 'apathy', which often is considered a separate construct. With the exception of 'suicidal thoughts', most psychological symptoms, such as 'hypochondriasis', 'lack of insight' and 'feelings of guilt', were not very sensitive. Some somatic symptoms, such as 'reduced appetite', 'psychomotor retardation', and 'fatigue' had high discriminative properties.
Psychological, neurocognitive and somatic symptoms of depression differ among themselves in terms of diagnostic sensitivity, and should be considered individually. Some somatic symptoms are highly sensitive for depression and should not be neglected by following an 'exclusive' or 'attributional' approach to the diagnosis of PSD.
抑郁症的躯体症状和神经认知症状可能与中风的躯体症状重叠,从而使中风后抑郁症的诊断变得困难。
评估个体抑郁症状的敏感性及其对中风后抑郁症诊断的贡献。
206例首次发生中风的患者参与了一项纵向研究,接受了DSM-IV结构化临床访谈和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)评估。在判别分析中,评估了HAM-D各个项目对重度抑郁症诊断的相对贡献。
中风后重度抑郁症的累积发病率为32%。基于HAM-D项目得分的判别模型具有高度显著性(p<0.001),能将88.3%的患者正确分类为抑郁或非抑郁。正如预期的那样,“情绪低落”在抑郁和非抑郁中风患者之间的区分效果最佳。“兴趣减退”的敏感性相对较低,可能部分反映了“冷漠”,而冷漠通常被视为一个独立的概念。除“自杀观念”外,大多数心理症状,如“疑病观念”“缺乏洞察力”和“内疚感”,敏感性都不是很高。一些躯体症状,如“食欲减退”“精神运动迟缓”和“疲劳”,具有较高的判别特性。
抑郁症的心理、神经认知和躯体症状在诊断敏感性方面各不相同,应分别予以考虑。一些躯体症状对抑郁症具有高度敏感性,在诊断中风后抑郁症时不应采用“排他性”或“归因性”方法而予以忽视。