Suppr超能文献

近期和足月儿产房复苏期间容量扩张的应用。

Use of volume expansion during delivery room resuscitation in near-term and term infants.

作者信息

Wyckoff Myra H, Perlman Jeffrey M, Laptook Abbot R

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):950-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0913.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize use of volume infusion (VI) for infants who are > or =34 weeks' gestational age and receive intensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; defined as >1 minute of positive-pressure ventilation and chest compressions, with or without the administration of medications) in the delivery room and are admitted to the NICU.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a resuscitation registry between January 1999 and June 2001 was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 37,972 infants, 23 received CPR, including 13 with VI. Ten of 13 received VI for persistent bradycardia despite CPR, and only 3 of 13 received VI for suspicion of hypovolemia with poor perfusion. More VI versus no VI infants had Apgar scores < or =2 at 5 and 10 minutes. VI versus no VI infants had lower cord arterial pH, had higher arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, had larger base deficit, required longer CPR, and required more epinephrine. On admission to the NICU, VI versus no VI infants had lower blood pressure and larger base deficit over the first 2 hours but did not differ in arterial pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, heart rate, mortality, or use of additional VI or buffer.

CONCLUSIONS

VI is rarely given for overt hypovolemia and more often for asphyxiated infants who are slow to respond to intensive CPR. Persistent postnatal hypotension in VI infants suggests that other factors, eg, myocardial dysfunction, may be important contributors to lack of response to CPR.

摘要

目的

描述孕周≥34周、在产房接受强化心肺复苏(CPR;定义为正压通气和胸外按压超过1分钟,无论是否使用药物)并入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的婴儿使用容量输注(VI)的情况。

方法

对1999年1月至2001年6月期间的复苏登记册进行回顾性研究。

结果

在37972例婴儿中,23例接受了CPR,其中13例接受了VI。13例中有10例因CPR后持续性心动过缓接受VI,13例中只有3例因怀疑血容量不足伴灌注不良接受VI。与未接受VI的婴儿相比,更多接受VI的婴儿在5分钟和10分钟时阿氏评分≤2分。接受VI与未接受VI的婴儿相比,脐动脉pH值更低,动脉二氧化碳分压更高,碱缺失更大,需要更长时间的CPR,且需要更多肾上腺素。入住NICU时,接受VI与未接受VI的婴儿在最初2小时内血压更低,碱缺失更大,但在动脉pH值、动脉二氧化碳分压、心率、死亡率或额外使用VI或缓冲剂方面无差异。

结论

VI很少用于明显的血容量不足,更多用于对强化CPR反应迟缓的窒息婴儿。接受VI的婴儿出生后持续性低血压表明,其他因素,如心肌功能障碍,可能是对CPR无反应的重要原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验